Judge, &C. v. Braswell, &C.
Decision Date | 27 March 1877 |
Citation | 76 Ky. 67 |
Parties | Judge, &c. v. Braswell, &c. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
APPEAL FROM LYON CIRCUIT COURT.
MUIR, BIJUR & DAVIE AND A. DUVALL FOR APPELLANTS.
EDWARDS & SEYMOUR ON SAME SIDE.
L. D. HUSBANDS FOR APPELLEES.
A. J. JAMES ON SAME SIDE.
JUDGE COFER DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT.
February 12, 1873, J. D. Morris, E. C. Machen, R. E. Cross, N. B. Peck, and Philip Judge entered into a written agreement, wherein it was recited that Morris & Machen had, by leases from the owners thereof, secured the right to enter upon divers tracts of land situated in Lyon County, for the purpose of prospecting for and mining iron ore and other minerals, and that there was much other land in the same county which could be leased upon similar terms. The writing then proceeds:
March 29, 1873, E. C. Machen purchased, in the name of Morris, Machen & Co., a tract of two hundred acres of land of the appellees, H. L. Machen and N. T. Braswell, at the price of $6,000, and a tract of two hundred acres of N. T. Braswell at the price of $2,000, and accepted deeds therefor, which on the 31st of March were lodged in the clerk's office of the Lyon County Court for record.
April 23d E. C. Machen drew, in the name of Morris, Machen & Co., upon Philip Judge, in favor of Machen & Braswell, for $6,000, and in favor of Braswell for $2,000, in payment for the land. Judge refused to accept or pay the bills, and these suits were brought thereon against Morris, Machen & Co. Cross, Peck, and Judge denied the right of E. C. Machen to purchase lands for the firm; averred that they had not been consulted, and had not consented to either of the purchases; that such purchases were frauds upon them, and had been made pursuant to a fraudulent conspiracy between E. C. Machen and H. L. Machen and Braswell; pleaded non est factum to the bills, and renounced any and all claim to the lands. They also set up the article of partnership, and alleged that at the time of making the sales both H. L. Machen and Braswell knew that E. C. Machen had no authority to make the purchases.
By consent of the parties the suits were transferred to equity and consolidated, and on final hearing judgments were rendered for the plaintiffs, and from those judgments Cross, Peck, and Judge prosecute this appeal.
There was...
To continue reading
Request your trial