Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Prather
| Decision Date | 01 March 1939 |
| Docket Number | 27409. |
| Citation | 2 S.E.2d 115,59 Ga.App. 797 |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | ÆTNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. et al. v. PRATHER. |
Rehearing Denied March 30, 1939.
Syllabus by the Court.
Haas Gambrell & Gardner, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
J T. Middlebrooks and Rupert A. Brown, both of Athens, for defendants in error.
1. A corporation, engaged in the business of hauling passengers for hire, under a certificate issued by the Georgia Public Service Commission, is without authority to employ an independent contractor, who has no certificate, to perform such a service, so as to escape liability for negligence or its liability to pay compensation to an injured employee. If it attempts to do so the person sought to be employed as an independent contractor shall be considered the employee of the carrier and so shall a person employed by the so-called independent contractor to drive the vehicle in which the passengers are carried. This is true because the law requires the carrier to insure against injury to its passengers and makes it responsible for the fitness of the drivers of its vehicles, which duties it is against public policy to the State for the carrier to delegate to another over whom the Public Service Commission could have no jurisdiction. It would make no difference that the carrier did not directly pay the driver for his services. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stapleton, 37 Ga.App. 707(2) 141 S.E. 506; Roberts v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 42 Ga.App. 668(2), 157 S.E. 537; Swift & Co. v. Alston, 48 Ga.App. 649, 173 S.E. 741. The deceased driver in this case, employed by one whom the carrier had contracted to furnish his car for transportation of overflow passengers, was the employee of the carrier, and his wife was entitled to the compensation awarded.
2. The deceased earned $2.97 on the day he was killed. He was subject to call at any time but was called once or twice every two weeks. Under the definition of "regular wage" as laid down in the case of McBrayer v. Columbia Casualty Co., 44 Ga.App. 59 160 S.E. 556, the term does not involve continuity of employment, but regularity of wage. Georgia Power Co. v. McCook, 48 Ga.App. 138, 172 S.E. 78; Code, §§ 114-402, 114-101; Maloney v. Kirby, 48 Ga.App. 252, 172 S.E. 683; Continental Casualty Co. v. Haynie, 182 Ga. 608, 186 S.E. 683. The Industrial Board did not err in computing the compensation...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tharp v. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 2201
... ... Marsch & Co ... (N. Y.) 186 N.Y.S. 689; Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Ind ... Acc. Com. of Cal., 43 A. L. R. 1304; Washington Pub ... of the state law regulating such matters. See also Aetna ... Casualty & Surety Co. v. Prather, 59 Ga.App. 797, 2 ... S.E.2d 115 ... ...
-
Rapid Group, Inc. v. Yellow Cab of Columbus, A01A1363.
...with the local ordinances. See Karwoski, 226 Ga.App. at 63, 486 S.E.2d 39, and cases cited therein; Aetna Cas. &c., Co. v. Prather, 59 Ga.App. at 797(1), 2 S.E.2d 115 (1939).2 For the purposes of this decision, the application of a local ordinance to determine employee/independent contracto......
-
Newsome v. Surratt
...158; Carter v. E. T. & W. N. C. Transp. Co., Tenn.App., 243 S.W.2d 505; Eli v. Murphy, Cal.Sup., 248 P.2d 756; Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Prather, 59 Ga.App. 797, 2 S.E.2d 115. It is stated in 57 C.J.S., Master and Servant, § 591, page 368, 'An individual or a corporation cannot evade l......
-
Block v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
...prevailing in the United States. 13 C.J.S. Carriers § 629, p. 1182. The rule is founded upon public policy. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Prather, 59 Ga.App. 797, 2 S.E.2d 115; Philippine Air Lines, Inc. v. Texas Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc., 5th Cir. 1950, 181 F.2d 923. Where the......