United States v. Alston

• Decision Date: 24 October 2019
• Docket Number: No. 18-4524,18-4524
• Citation: 941 F.3d 132
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jurother Lee ALSTON, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

941 F.3d 132

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.Jurother Lee ALSTON, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.

No. 18-4524

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: September 20, 2019

Decided: October 24, 2019

ARGUED: Leza Lee Driscoll, LAW OFFICE OF LEZA LEE DRISCOLL, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Terry Michael Meinecke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Judge Diaz joined.

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

Jurother Lee Alston, Jr., entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug crime, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Alston now appeals that order. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I.

We recount the facts related to the suppression motion in the light most favorable to the Government. See United States v. Norman , 935 F.3d 232, 235 (4th Cir. 2019).

On December 11, 2017, Captain Raheem Aleem of the Durham County Sheriff’s Office saw Alston run a red light. Driving behind Alston, Captain Aleem activated his blue emergency lights, but Alston failed to stop. Aleem watched Alston reach deep under the passenger seat of his car — so deep that he briefly disappeared from Aleem’s view. Captain Aleem suspected that Alston was reaching for a gun. Looking back at Aleem and continuing to reach down, Alston slowly drove into a parked car and came to a stop.

Captain Aleem, concerned that Alston might try to flee, pulled up next to Alston’s car. When asked why he ran a red light, Alston explained that he was distracted. Aleem next asked why Alston was reaching deep under his seat, and Alston replied that he had dropped his cell phone. Captain Aleem was skeptical; he heard a woman’s voice in an ongoing phone call with Alston over the car’s speakers and noticed Alston holding his phone in his left hand despite reaching under the seat with his right.

Aleem responded, "Bro, you mighty nervous, you got anything else in the vehicle that you shouldn’t have?" Alston replied, "All I got is this little bag of weed." He held up a small bag of marijuana and, at Aleem’s request, tossed it into the officer’s vehicle.

Captain Aleem then asked Alston for his driver’s license, which Alston admitted was suspended. Aleem asked if Alston "could call someone else to drive the vehicle," and Alston called his mother to do so. Captain Aleem parked and approached Alston. Noticing that Alston remained very nervous, Aleem assured him that he did not intend to take him to jail and "just want[ed] [him] to be honest." The two made small talk until Alston’s mother arrived about five minutes later.

Alston’s mother joined Captain Aleem outside Alston’s car, while Alston remained seated inside. Aleem told Alston that besides the small bag of marijuana, he "still needed to find out whatever else [Alston] had in the vehicle." He added, "I’ve been straightforward with you, and I need for you to be honest and straightforward with me." Alston then handed over a black bag containing marijuana, a digital scale, and small plastic bags. He told Aleem it was "all he had."

Captain Aleem thanked Alston but continued to suspect that Alston had been reaching for a gun and sought to have him turn it over. Aleem told Alston and his mother, "I’m going to need to get the heater" (a slang term for a firearm). Alston replied, "[A]re you going to take me to jail?" Captain Aleem assured him, "I need you to be honest with me and I will not take you to jail today." Alston paused, looked at his mother and Aleem, and admitted, "It is underneath the passenger seat." Aleem then asked Alston to exit the vehicle.

Captain Aleem searched Alston’s person and found nothing. He then searched the passenger side of the vehicle and retrieved a loaded Glock firearm from under the seat. Aleem called dispatch to check the gun’s serial number and learned that the gun was stolen. He returned to Alston and reiterated that he did not intend to take Alston to jail.

As he was talking to Alston, however, Captain Aleem received a call from Durham County Deputy James Gryder, a member of a joint task force with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Based on an independent tip, the task force was separately investigating whether Alston, a convicted felon, illegally possessed a firearm, and a confidential source had alerted Gryder that Alston was in a traffic stop. Deputy Gryder asked Aleem if he was with Alston and if Alston had a gun. Captain Aleem confirmed that he was with Alston and that Alston did have a gun. Deputy Gryder told Aleem to detain Alston until task force officers arrived, and Aleem did so. Captain Aleem informed Alston’s mother that he did not intend to take Alston to jail, but that he did not know what would happen when the other officers got there.

Deputy Gryder and other task force officers soon arrived at the scene. Captain Aleem told Gryder that he had promised Alston and his mother that he would not arrest Alston, but Gryder responded that Alston was "on both state and federal probation" and that the task force "would be taking over." Task force officers then arrested Alston.

II.

A grand jury indicted Alston on counts of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of a firearm in furtherance of that crime, possession of a firearm by a felon, and possession of a stolen firearm. Alston moved to suppress all evidence obtained in the stop.

The district court granted Alston’s motion in part and denied it in part. The court found Captain Aleem to be "a very credible witness" and "a very sincere person" and credited his testimony. The court determined that the initial stop was permissible because Alston had run a red light, "disappeared out of sight as if he were reaching for something or to hide something," attempted to evade Aleem until hitting a parked car, and gave a dubious account of dropping his phone. Reviewing Captain Aleem’s words and conduct at the start of the stop, the court found that he had not been coercive during that time. Accordingly, the court held that Alston’s confession about the first bag of marijuana was voluntary and denied the suppression motion for evidence obtained through that point in the stop.

Given Captain Aleem’s assurances that he did not intend to arrest Alston, however, the district court found that Alston’s subsequent admissions were involuntary. The court emphasized that Aleem, a community liaison officer and former school resource officer who preferred alternative programs to jailing offenders, was sincere. But the court concluded that a reasonable person in Alston’s position would understand Captain Aleem’s statements to mean that law enforcement — not only Aleem, but also any other officers — would not arrest him if he confessed. These assurances, the court concluded, overbore Alston’s will, and the court suppressed his statements about the black bag and the gun.

But the district court refused to exclude the gun itself. The court found that Alston’s admission about and presentation of the first bag of marijuana gave Captain Aleem probable cause to search the car. The court held that even if Alston had not admitted to possession of the gun, it "would have inevitably been found because there was probable cause to search." The court did not, however, expressly find that the police would have conducted the search, only that there was probable cause to do so.

Alston entered a conditional guilty plea to the sole charge of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug crime, reserving his right to appeal the suppression ruling. The district court sentenced Alston to sixty months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release.

On appeal, Alston challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress "all derivative evidence resulting from his statements." Opening Br. at 17. We review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. United States v. McGee , 736 F.3d 263, 269 (4th Cir. 2013).

III.

Alston expressly poses three arguments. All are meritless.

First, he claims that his entire interaction with Captain Aleem amounted to custodial interrogation and that because Aleem failed to read him his rights, under Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), the district court should have excluded all evidence obtained from the stop, including the gun. Of course, the exclusionary rule bars admission of the nontestimonial physical fruits of statements obtained in violation of Miranda when those statements are involuntary, and statements obtained in violation of Miranda are presumptively involuntary. See United States v. Nichols , 438 F.3d 437, 442 (4th Cir. 2006). The district court agreed with Alston that most of his statements were involuntary and so excluded them. The court admitted the derivative evidence, including the gun, not because it was the fruit of voluntary statements, but because the court found that the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule rendered the derivative evidence admissible.

Second, Alston contends that all of his statements were involuntary. The district court held that Alston’s first statements were voluntary, as Captain Aleem had not yet made any promises or otherwise said anything coercive, and we find no error in that holding. As noted above, the district court held that the statements admitting possession of the gun were involuntary and so excluded those statements; they are not at issue before us.

Third, Alston maintains that Captain Aleem impermissibly prolonged their interaction by exceeding the scope of the stop, in violation of...