Bey v. Mitchell

Decision Date24 March 2008
Docket NumberNo. 07–8411.,07–8411.
Citation552 U.S. 1281,170 L.Ed.2d 516,128 S.Ct. 1704,76 USLW 3511
PartiesGregory Bryant BEY, petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, Bey v. Bagley, 500 F.3d 514.

*1705 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Rodriguez v. Jones
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • June 9, 2009
    ... ... Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974). The complained-of conduct must be both improper and flagrant, Broom v. Mitchell, 441 F.3d 392, 412 (6th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1255, 127 S.Ct. 1376, 167 L.Ed.2d 165 (2007), and "so egregious ... as to render the entire trial fundamentally unfair." Cook v. Bordenkircher, 602 F.2d 117, 119 (6th Cir.1979). When determining whether a prosecutor's comments were ... ...
  • Jensen v. Romanowski, 06-11605.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • April 29, 2008
    ... ... United States, 519 U.S. 172, 117 S.Ct. 644, 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997); Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681, 108 S.Ct. 1496, 99 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988), it has not explicitly addressed the issue in constitutional terms ...          Bugh v. Mitchell, 329 F.3d 496, 512-13 (6th Cir.2003). 2 Because there is no Supreme Court decision holding that the admission of "other acts" evidence violates the Constitution, the state court's conclusion that the evidence was admissible cannot be deemed "contrary to" Supreme Court precedent under 28 U.S.C. § ... ...
  • Dawson v. Harris
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • April 4, 2022
    ...Bey v. Bagley, 500 F.3d 514, 521 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 43 (1977) (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1281 (2008); see also Wright v. Dallman, 999 F.2d 174, 178 (6th Cir. 1993). As pertinent here, “[f]ederal habeas courts review state court evide......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT