Aaron v. American Nat. Bank

Decision Date25 July 1916
Docket Number7375.
Citation159 P. 246,60 Okla. 137
PartiesAARON ET AL. v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

Errors occurring during the trial cannot be considered by the Supreme Court unless the ruling of the trial court on the motion for a new trial is assigned as error.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, Osage County; R. H. Hudson, Judge.

Action by the American National Bank against W. H. Aaron and another on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Dismissed.

Templeton & Tillman, of Pawhuska, for plaintiffs in error.

Robert Stuart and A. M. Widdows, both of Pawhuska, for defendant in error.

BRUNSON, C.

This court has repeatedly held that errors occurring during the trial cannot be considered unless motion for a new trial has been made by the complaining party, and acted upon by the trial court, and its ruling assigned as error in the Supreme Court. Avery v. Hays, 44 Okl. 71, 144 P. 624; Kee v. Park et al., 32 Okl. 302, 122 P. 712; Stinchcomb v. Myers, 28 Okl. 597, 115 P. 602; St. Louis & S. F. R. R. Co. v. Leake et al., 34 Okl. 77, 123 P. 1125. The plaintiffs in error, defendants below, have not assigned as error the ruling of the court upon the motion for a new trial, and therefore we cannot consider the errors alleged to have occurred during the trial. The only errors complained of are those occurring upon the trial. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

Adopted in whole.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT