ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Flores, 97-2230
| Decision Date | 07 October 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-2230,97-2230 |
| Citation | 22 Fla. L. Weekly 2349,700 So.2d 102 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly 2349 ABC LIQUORS, INC., and United Self-Insured Services, Petitioners, v. Julio FLORES, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Charles R. Stepter, Jr. of Fishback, Dominick, Bennett, Stepter, Ardaman, Ahlers & Bonus, Orlando, for Petitioners.
Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood; Michael Manglardi, Orlando, for Respondent.
We deny the petition for writ of certiorari filed by the employer and insurance carrier, ABC Liquors, Inc., and United Self-Insured Services (respectively the E/C), asking this court to quash an order granting Julio Flores' motion for a psychiatric independent medical examination (IME). We conclude that the correspondence from Flores, the claimant, to the E/C demonstrates the existence of a dispute over a requested medical benefit under section 440.13(5), Florida Statutes (1995), which gave Flores the authority to select an independent medical examiner.
Flores was injured at work on April 16, 1996, and thereafter received treatment for a herniated disc. He sent a letter to the E/C asking for an IME with a psychiatrist, because he had become increasingly depressed about his condition and progress. When the E/C declined, Flores filed a motion pursuant to section 440.13(5), which provides, in part: "In any dispute concerning overutilization, medical benefits, compensability, or disability under this chapter, the carrier or the employee may select an independent medical examiner." The E/C contends that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in granting the motion, because the dispute between the parties did not fall within any of the four categories of this provision. We disagree.
Flores' request for an IME was essentially a request for authorization of a psychiatrist under section 440.13(2) to evaluate his symptoms and determine his need for treatment. The E/C's denial of such request created a dispute over a medical benefit under section 440.13(5); therefore, the JCC properly granted Flores' motion for IME.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stahl v. Hialeah Hosp. & Sedgwick CMS, 1D13–3929.
...“the only condition required for a party to request an IME is a dispute.” (emphasis in original) (citing ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Flores, 700 So.2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) and Union Camp Corp. v. Hurst, 696 So.2d 873, 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)). See also Lehoullier 43 So.3d at 836 (holding that “......
-
Velasquez v. Malaja Const., Inc.
...may therefore create a dispute of the kind contemplated by section 440.13(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). See ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Flores, 700 So.2d 102, 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Differences over future medical benefits may also arise after medical benefits have been furnished, when one par......
-
Cortina v. STATE, DEPT. OF HRS
...examiner. Under section 440.13(5)(a), the only condition required for a party to request an IME is a dispute. See ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Flores, 700 So.2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Union Camp Corp. v. Hurst, 696 So.2d 873, 875 (Fla. 1st DCA Under relevant case law, there are two ways to create......