Aberdeen Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Chase
Decision Date | 12 June 1930 |
Docket Number | 22228. |
Citation | 289 P. 536,157 Wash. 351 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | ABERDEEN SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N et al. v. CHASE et al., Tax Commission. [*] |
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County; John M. Wilson, Judge.
Suit by the Aberdeen Savings & Loan Association and others against Samuel H. Chase and others, as members of the Tax Commission of the state of Washington. From a judgment dismissing the action, plaintiffs appeal.
Reversed with instructions.
See also, Burr v. Chase, 289 P. 551.
Grinstead, Laube, Laughlin & Lichty, of Seattle, and Henderson, Carnahan & Thompson, of Tacoma, for appellants.
John H. Dunbar and E. W. Anderson, both of Olympia, for respondents.
Plaintiff Aberdeen Savings & Loan Association and sixty-two other savings and loan associations, doing business in this state, and organized under the provisions of chapter 1, title 21, Rem. Comp. Stat. (section 3716 et seq.), and acts amendatory thereto brought this action against the members of the state tax commission, seeking to enjoin the enforcement as against plaintiffs of chapter 151, p. 380, Session Laws of 1929, providing for a tax measured by income upon banks and financial corporations, plaintiffs praying in the alternative for relief against certain alleged threatened illegal applications of the act by defendants.
To plaintiffs' complaint defendants demurred. The demurrer having been sustained by the trial court, plaintiffs elected to stand upon their complaint, and from a judgment dismissing the action they appeal.
In their complaint appellants allege that, prior to the convening of the Legislature in January, 1929, the system of taxation which had theretofore been in effect in this state had been seriously affected by litigation which had been instituted by certain of the railroad and banking corporations for the purpose of procuring relief against alleged excessive, unjust, and discriminatory taxes levied against their respective properties, which litigation threatened to seriously impair the revenues of the state, and also of the counties and other municipal corporations. Appellants quote at length from the messages of the Governor to the state Legislature, and set forth certain proceedings of the Legislature, had with a view to some readjustment of the laws having for their object the raising of revenue.
Chapter 151, p. 380, Laws of 1929, against which act this attack is waged, attempts to provide, as expressed in its title, 'for a tax measured by income upon banks and financial corporations,' provides for the assessment and collection thereof, and for certain offsets or deductions to be considered in determining the amount of taxes due from institutions liable to pay the same. Corporations organized to do 'a savings and loan or building and loan' business are expressly named in the act as subject to the provisions thereof. The terms 'gross income,' 'net income,' and 'financial corporation' are in the act defined as follows:
After the section of the act containing definitions of the terms therein used, the act continues:
* * *
notice in writing by registered mail to the taxpayer of the amount to which it is proposed to increase such basis of computation, and of the time and place when and where such taxpayer will be heard by the commission in opposition to such proposed increase.
'The commission shall also enter upon such assessment roll opposite to or in connection with the name of each bank or corporation the name or designation of the city, town, township, school district and other taxing districts within said county in which said taxpayer has its principal office or place of business together with the net income or basis for the computation of the tax as determined by the commission and the amount of the tax due and payable as computed by it.
'The assessor of such county shall enter upon the tax rolls of the county the name of each bank and corporation and the amount of such tax due from it as shown by such assessment roll. * * *
Appellants contend that the act of the Legislature which they attack in this proceeding violates the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Washington. Constitutional provisions upon which appellants rely are the following:
Constitution of the United States, art. 1, § 10, par. 1: 'No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.'
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, section 1: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial