Abernathy v. Dorsey

Decision Date10 October 1939
Docket Number13017.
Citation5 S.E.2d 39,189 Ga. 72
PartiesABERNATHY et al. v. DORSEY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

A. H. Henderson, of Cleveland, for plaintiffs in error.

C. H. Edwards, of Cleveland, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

JENKINS, Justice.

This case arose on a petition by taxpayers, seeking to enjoin an ordinary from calling a county-wide stock election, under the Code, § 62-501, and the acts there codified, on the question of fence or no-fence. The statute provides for an election on the first Wednesday in July. On July 1, 1939, the court sustained a general demurrer to the petition, and refused an injunction. The record does not show any supersedeas. The defendant moves to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the case has become moot, because the election was held on July 5, 1939; and attaches to his motion a certificate by the ordinary to that effect. The reply of the plaintiffs admits that the election 'has already occurred.' They contend, however, that the writ of error should not be dismissed, because they would 'derive much and lasting benefits' from an adjudication that there was no 'legal authority to hold the election.'

The only question and subject-matter of the case having become moot by the actual holding of the election, the mere fact that the plaintiffs might possibly derive some future benefit from a favorable adjudication on the abstract question, or that a decision would settle the question of costs, will not authorize this court to retain and decide the case. Wise v. Sims, 182 Ga. 857, 187 S.E. 102; Griffin v. Securities Investment Co., 184 Ga. 692(4), 192 S.E. 909; Davisc v. Cason, 185 Ga. 334, 194 S.E. 874.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Kappers v. DeKalb County Bd. of Health
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 1994
    ...from a favorable adjudication on an abstract question ... will not require this court to retain and decide the case. Abernathy v. Dorsey, 189 Ga. 72 (5 SE2d 39)." ' Nat. Council of Jewish Women v. Cobb County, 247 Ga. 198 (275 SE2d 315) (1981) and cits.; Goodyear v. Trust Co. Bank, 247 Ga. ......
  • Bulman v. King
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 22, 1956
    ...ineffectual, and the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. Smith v. Jeffries, 188 Ga. 649, 4 S.E.2d 637; Abernathy v. Dorsey, 189 Ga. 72, 5 S.E.2d 36; Brockett v. Maxwell, 200 Ga. 38, 35 S.E.2d 906; Davison v. City of Summerville, 204 Ga. 748, 51 S.E.2d 820; Rentz v. Moody,......
  • Chastain v. Baker, 42888
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1986
    ...from a favorable adjudication on an abstract question ... will not require this court to retain and decide the case. Abernathy v. Dorsey, 189 Ga. 72 (5 SE2d 39).' " National Council of Jewish Women v. Cobb County, 247 Ga. 198, 275 S.E.2d 315 (1981) and cits.; Goodyear v. Trust Co. Bank, 247......
  • National Council of Jewish Women v. Cobb County, 36874
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1981
    ...from a favorable adjudication on an abstract question ... will not require this court to retain and decide the case. Abernathy v. Dorsey, 189 Ga. 72, 5 S.E.2d 39." See also Board of Comm. of Walton County v. Dept. of Public Health, 229 Ga. 173(2), 190 S.E.2d 39 (1972). The cases of Nix v. S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT