Abizadeh v. Abizadeh
| Decision Date | 26 June 2019 |
| Docket Number | 2018-06958,Docket No. F-7783-12/17G |
| Citation | 173 A.D.3d 1168,101 N.Y.S.3d 624 (Mem) |
| Parties | In the Matter of Ramin ABIZADEH, Appellant, v. Galit ABIZADEH, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
173 A.D.3d 1168
101 N.Y.S.3d 624 (Mem)
In the Matter of Ramin ABIZADEH, Appellant,
v.
Galit ABIZADEH, Respondent.
2018-06958
Docket No. F-7783-12/17G
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Submitted—April 25, 2019
June 26, 2019
Ramin Abizadeh, Albertson, NY, appellant pro se.
Law Offices of Seidner & Associates, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Matthew S. Seidner of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., COLLEEN D. DUFFY, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Danielle M. Peterson, J.), dated April 19, 2018. The order denied the father's objections to an order of the same court (Adam E. Small, S.M.) dated October 17, 2017, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.
ORDERED that the order dated April 19, 2018, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The parties, who were married in 1995, have three children together. Pursuant to the terms of a judgment of divorce entered on May 28, 2014, the father was required to pay the sum of $4,009 per month toward basic child support. In April 2017, the father filed a petition seeking a downward modification of his child support obligation. After a hearing, the Support Magistrate issued an order dismissing the father's petition. The father filed objections to the Support Magistrate's determination. By order dated April 19, 2018, the Family Court denied the father's objections. The father appeals.
We agree with the Family Court's determination that the father failed to establish that an alleged reduction in his income constituted a substantial change in circumstances so as to warrant a downward modification of his child support obligation
To continue reading
Request your trial
- People v. Glover
-
McGraw v. Capuano
...its original determination and denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants appeal.173 A.D.3d 1168 CPLR 2221(e) authorizes a motion for leave to renew "based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determinati......