ABN Amro Mortg. Grp., Inc. v. Stephens

Decision Date24 January 2012
Citation2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00477,91 A.D.3d 801,939 N.Y.S.2d 70
PartiesABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., appellant, v. Kayann STEPHENS, et al., respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 00477
91 A.D.3d 801
939 N.Y.S.2d 70

ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., appellant,
v.
Kayann STEPHENS, et al., respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Jan. 24, 2012.


[939 N.Y.S.2d 71]

Solomon & Siris, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Stuart Siris and Bill Tsevis of counsel), for appellant.

Miller, Rosado & Algios, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Neil A. Miller of counsel), for respondents.

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., L. PRISCILLA HALL, PLUMMER E. LOTT, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, inter alia, to determine claims to real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated August 11, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing the counterclaims.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing the counterclaims is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the power of attorney purportedly granted by Sally Mandeville to Bertram Brown is a forgery, that the defendants' interests in the subject property are null and void, and that the plaintiff's mortgage is valid.

On August 29, 2005, a power of attorney was recorded in the Office of the City Register of the City of New York, in and for the County of Kings (hereinafter the City Register), purporting to authorize Bertram Brown to sell a parcel of real property on behalf of “Sally Manderville” (hereinafter the Brown power of attorney). On the same day, a deed was recorded with the City Register purporting to transfer the interest of “Sally Manderville” in the subject property to Westport Marketing, Inc. (hereinafter Westport). Westport's purported interest was transferred to Hometech Building Corp. (hereinafter Hometech) by a deed recorded on November 18, 2005, and Hometech transferred its purported interest to the defendant Kayann Stephens by a deed recorded on July 24, 2006. Stephens purportedly mortgaged the subject property to the defendant Mortgage Lender's Network, USA, Inc. (hereinafter Mortgage Lender's). The plaintiff, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., took a mortgage on the subject properly from another purported owner, Rachida Allam.

The plaintiff commenced this action on November 30, 2006, pursuant to RPAPL article 15. The plaintiff's first and second causes of action sought a judgment declaring that the Brown power of attorney was a forgery, that the defendants' interests in the property were null and void, and that its mortgage was valid pursuant to an unrecorded chain of title. The third cause of action sought cancellation of the defendants' deed and mortgage. In their answer to the complaint, the defendants asserted counterclaims alleging that the defendant Stephens was the lawful owner of the subject premises and that the defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (hereinafter MERS), as nominee for Mortgage Lender's, held two valid mortgages on the subject property.

The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissing the defendants' counterclaims. In support of the motion, the plaintiff submitted evidence that Sally Mandeville moved from Brooklyn to South Carolina in February 2002, when she was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Arnav Indus., Inc. v., Index No. 13965/1990
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 23, 2014
    ...328 (1st Dep't 2005); Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Earthline Corp., 262 A.D.2d 253, 253 (1st Dep't 1999); ABN AMRO Mtge . Group, Inc. v. Stephens, 91 A.D.3d 801, 803 (2d Dep't 2012), which may be rebutted only by clear and convincing evidence amounting to a "moral certainty." Genger v. Arie Genger ......
  • FTBK Investor II LLC v. Genesis Holding LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 19, 2014
    ...2005) ; Seaboard Sur. Co. v. Earthline Corp., 262 A.D.2d 253, 692 N.Y.S.2d 375 (1st Dep't 1999) ; ABN AMRO Mtge. Group, Inc. v. Stephens, 91 A.D.3d 801, 803, 939 N.Y.S.2d 70 (2d Dep't 2012), which is undisputed. See Genger v. Arie Genger 1995 Life Ins. Trust, 84 A.D.3d at 472, 922 N.Y.S.2d ......
  • Weiss v. Phillips
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2017
    ...pass title and cannot be enforced even if title is later acquired by a bona fide purchaser (id.; ABN AMRO Mtge. Group, Inc. v. Stephens, 91 A.D.3d 801, 803, 939 N.Y.S.2d 70 [2d Dept.2012] ). Similarly, a lender who takes a mortgage to a property subject to a void deed does not have anything......
  • AMK Capital Corp. v. Cifre Realty Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 27, 2023
    ...(Marden at 56; Faison at 225; Weiss at 10; ABN AMRO Mortg. Group, Inc. at 803). In other words, a void deed is void ab initio (AMRO Mortg. Group, Inc. at 803; Cruz v Cruz, 37 A.D.3d 754 [2d Dept 2007]), or the court in Marden aptly stated, "[i]t is legally impossible for any one to become a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT