Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp.

Decision Date19 November 1990
Docket NumberA90A0781,Nos. A90A0780,s. A90A0780
PartiesABRAHAMSEN v. McDONALD'S CORPORATION.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Donald E. Loveless, Atlanta, for appellant.

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Craig R. Pendergrast, John G. Parker, Atlanta, for appellee.

BANKE, Presiding Judge.

This litigation commenced as an action by the appellant to recover damages from the appellee for the alleged breach of a series of construction contracts. The appellee responded with a counterclaim for actual damages, punitive damages, and litigation expenses based on allegations of fraud, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court awarded summary judgment to the appellee with respect to the appellant's claims, and this court affirmed that ruling in Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp., 193 Ga.App. 868, 389 S.E.2d 386 (1989). The counterclaim remains pending in the trial court.

Subsequent to the grant of its motion for summary judgment on the complaint, the appellee filed a motion in the trial court seeking litigation costs and attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14, based on allegations that the complaint had lacked substantial justification. In this motion, the appellee requested "leave to present evidence of the amounts of ... fees and expenses incurred in the defense of the [litigation]." However, the trial court denied the motion for the stated reason that the appellee had failed to provide such evidence. Cf. Gilbert v. E & W Constr. Co., 181 Ga.App. 281(1), 351 S.E.2d 523 (1986). The appellee moved for reconsideration of this ruling, submitting an affidavit setting forth the amount of attorney fees it sought to recover; and the trial court thereafter entered an order assessing attorney fees against the appellant in the amount of $10,253.75. We granted the appellant's application for a discretionary appeal from that order; and, after we did so, the trial court, acting sua sponte, entered yet another order reducing the award of attorney fees to $5,063.44. The appellants also applied for a discretionary appeal from that order, and we also granted that application. Held:

1. Pursuant to subsection (e) of OCGA § 9-15-14, a claim for reasonable and necessary attorney fees and expenses of litigation to punish or deter litigation abuses must be brought "within 45 days after the final disposition of the [underlying] action." Since the appellee's counterclaim remains pending in the trial court, there clearly has been no final...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Hutchison v. Divorce & Custody Law Center of Arline Kerman & Associates, P.C.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 1993
    ...Defendants also sought such an award for expenses incurred in defending the motion to dismiss. In Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp., 197 Ga.App. 624, 625(1), 398 S.E.2d 861 (1990), the trial court granted defendant's motion for an OCGA § 9-15-14 award of attorney fees and litigation expenses, ......
  • Adams v. Moffatt
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 1992
    ...abuses must be brought 'within 45 days after the final disposition of the (underlying) action.' " Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp., 197 Ga.App. 624, 625(1), 398 S.E.2d 861 (1990). The motion for fees and expenses was filed and it was granted prior to the dismissal without prejudice on June 5.......
  • Moore v. Dixon
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 21, 1994
    ...the trial court was not authorized to enter an award of attorney['s] fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14. Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp., 197 Ga.App. 624, 625(1), 398 S.E.2d 861 (1990). See also Deavours v. Hog Mtn. Creations, Inc., 207 Ga.App. 557, 558(3), 428 S.E.2d 388 (1993), aff'd, 263 Ga.......
  • Deavours v. Hog Mountain Creations, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 1993
    ...abuses must be brought 'within 45 days after the final disposition of the (underlying) action.' " Abrahamsen v. McDonald's Corp., 197 Ga.App. 624, 625(1), 398 S.E.2d 861 (1990). Although appellees filed an initial counterclaim purporting to invoke OCGA § 9-15-14, they never filed a timely m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT