Abrusci v. Abrusci

• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
• Writing for the Court: Before HOPKINS
• Citation: Abrusci v. Abrusci, 79 A.D.2d 980, 434 N.Y.S.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
• Decision Date: 12 January 1981
• Parties: Frank D. ABRUSCI, Appellant, v. Angelica ABRUSCI, Respondent.

Page 722

434 N.Y.S.2d 722

79 A.D.2d 980

Frank D. ABRUSCI, Appellant, v. Angelica ABRUSCI, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Jan. 12, 1981.

Michael S. Labush, White Plains (Candi Jan Fulop, White Plains, on brief), for appellant.

Gerald P. Goldsmith, New York City (Peter J. Dean, New York City, on brief), for respondent.

Before HOPKINS, J. P., and LAZER, COHALAN and WEINSTEIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 28, 1980, as (1) directed him to pay defendant $140 per week as alimony from the day he abandoned her, less credits for payments made to date, and (2) awarded defendant a counsel fee of $1,200.

Judgment modified, on the law, by (1) changing the date "September 25, 1978" in the second decretal paragraph to "July 6, 1979," and (2) reducing the counsel fee award to $900. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The award of $140 per week as alimony was a valid exercise of the court's discretion. However, the court erred in ordering alimony payments to commence as of the date of the abandonment. Such payments may be ordered to commence, at the earliest, only as of the time the action was commenced (see Harris v. Harris, 259 N.Y. 334, 182 N.E. 7; Brown v. Brown, 34 A.D.2d 907, 311 N.Y.S.2d 467), and even then, only with a proper regard for the circumstances of the particular case (see Mittman v. Mittman, 263 App.Div. 384, 33 N.Y.S.2d 211). Under the particular facts of this case, the husband's liability for alimony...