Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham, A17A1752

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
Writing for the CourtBethel, Judge.
Citation812 S.E.2d 509
Docket NumberA17A1752
Decision Date13 March 2018
Parties ACCESS MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.P. v. HANHAM et al.

345 Ga.App. 130
812 S.E.2d 509

ACCESS MANAGEMENT GROUP, L.P.
v.
HANHAM et al.

A17A1752

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

March 13, 2018


812 S.E.2d 511

Lervette Jones Blair, Atlanta, Ian Robert Rapaport, for Appellant.

James Stuart Teague Jr., Keisha Leigh Martin Chambless, for Appellee.

Bethel, Judge.

Access Management Group, L.P. appeals the denial of its motion for a directed verdict and entry of final judgment against it. Access Management argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict on the claims for negligence and breach of contract, that the verdict form submitted to the jury was erroneous, and that the trial court permitted a double recovery against it. We disagree and affirm.

James and Mary Hanham filed suit against their neighbor, Marie Berthe-Narchet, her landscaper GreenMaster Landscaping Service, Inc., and Access Management regarding a landscaping project Narchet had performed on Narchet's property. Narchet had hired GreenMaster to build a retaining wall, plant trees, and assist with a drainage issue in her backyard. The Hanhams alleged that Narchet's landscaping project channeled a large amount of water onto their property and that trees planted by Narchet were obstructing their view of the golf course, which reduced the value of their home.

Access Management was hired as the community management agent for the St. Marlo's neighborhood. As the community management agent, Access Management was responsible for managing the homeowner application process for landscaping modifications submitted to St. Marlo's architectural committee. To that end, Access Management collected information, reviewed it for compliance with the architectural standards manual, and forwarded it to St. Marlo's architectural committee for review and approval of the request.

Narchet's application for architectural review was submitted to Access Management in July 2012. The evidence presented at trial showed that the application failed to comply with the architectural standards manual in several respects. The Hanhams contend that the project was approved by Access Management without actual approval from St. Marlo's architectural committee, and that Access Management did not respond to their complaints regarding Narchet's landscaping project for at least five months.

At trial, Access Management moved for a directed verdict on all of the Hanhams' claims. The trial court granted directed verdicts to Access Management on the claims for trespass and nuisance but denied the request with respect to the claims for negligence, breach of contract, and invasion of privacy.1

The jury awarded damages and the trial entered final judgment against the defendants totaling $96,500, allocated as follows: (1) $5,000 compensatory damages for nuisance and negligence associated with the water flow and (1) (a) $12,000 in related attorney fees; (2) $7,000 compensatory damages for negligence with respect to the view and (2) (a) $10,000 in related attorney fees; and (3) $40,000 compensatory damages for breach of contract and (3) (a) $22,500 in related attorney fees. Access Management filed an objection to the final judgment, arguing that it provided for a double recovery to the plaintiffs because it awarded both contract

812 S.E.2d 512

and tort damages, and that the final judgment reflected an award for nuisance despite the trial court having entered a directed verdict on that claim. This appeal followed.

1. Access Management argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict with respect to the claims for negligence and breach of contract. "Such motions should be granted only where there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue, and the evidence presented, together with all reasonable deductions therefrom, demands a verdict in favor of the movant." Preferred Risk Ins. Co. v. Boykin , 174 Ga. App. 269, 271 (2), 329 S.E.2d 900 (1985) (citations omitted). See also OCGA § 9-11-50 (a). "On appeal from the denial of a motion for a directed verdict ... we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, and the standard of review is whether there is any evidence to support the jury's verdict." Park v. Nichols , 307 Ga. App. 841, 845 (2), 706 S.E.2d 698 (2011) (citation omitted).

(a) Access Management argues that the trial court erred in denying Access Management's motion for directed verdict as to the Hanham's breach of contract claim. More specifically, Access Management argues that the Hanhams failed to present evidence that it breached the terms of the management agreement between it and St. Marlo's. We agree.

In denying the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • In re Equifax, Inc., MDL DOCKET NO. 2800
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 28, 2019
    ...199 Ga. App. 138, 141, 404 S.E.2d 291 (1991) (internal quotations omitted).141 Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham , 345 Ga. App. 130, 133, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018) (internal quotations omitted).142 Id. (internal quotations omitted).143 Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner , 250 Ga. 199, 201, 296 S.E......
  • In re Equifax, Inc., MDL DOCKET NO. 2800
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 28, 2019
    ...199 Ga. App. 138, 141, 404 S.E.2d 291 (1991) (internal quotations omitted).79 Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham , 345 Ga. App. 130, 133, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018) (internal quotations omitted).80 Id. (internal quotations omitted).81 Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner , 250 Ga. 199, 201, 296 S.E.2d......
  • Hanham v. Access Mgmt. Grp. L.P., S18G1033
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • March 4, 2019
    ...The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the jury’s judgment as to that claim. See Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham, 345 Ga. App. 130, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018). Thereafter, we granted certiorari to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s denial of Access Manag......
  • Hanham v. Access Mgmt. Grp. L.P., S18G1033
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • March 4, 2019
    ...The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the jury's judgment as to that claim. See Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham, 345 Ga. App. 130, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018). Thereafter, we granted certiorari to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's denial of Access Manag......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • In re Equifax, Inc., MDL DOCKET NO. 2800
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 28, 2019
    ...199 Ga. App. 138, 141, 404 S.E.2d 291 (1991) (internal quotations omitted).141 Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham , 345 Ga. App. 130, 133, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018) (internal quotations omitted).142 Id. (internal quotations omitted).143 Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner , 250 Ga. 199, 201, 296 S.E......
  • In re Equifax, Inc., MDL DOCKET NO. 2800
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 28, 2019
    ...199 Ga. App. 138, 141, 404 S.E.2d 291 (1991) (internal quotations omitted).79 Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham , 345 Ga. App. 130, 133, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018) (internal quotations omitted).80 Id. (internal quotations omitted).81 Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner , 250 Ga. 199, 201, 296 S.E.2d......
  • Hanham v. Access Mgmt. Grp. L.P., S18G1033
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • March 4, 2019
    ...The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the jury’s judgment as to that claim. See Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham, 345 Ga. App. 130, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018). Thereafter, we granted certiorari to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s denial of Access Manag......
  • Hanham v. Access Mgmt. Grp. L.P., S18G1033
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Georgia
    • March 4, 2019
    ...The Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the jury's judgment as to that claim. See Access Mgmt. Grp., L.P. v. Hanham, 345 Ga. App. 130, 812 S.E.2d 509 (2018). Thereafter, we granted certiorari to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's denial of Access Manag......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT