Adams v. Adams, 95-0813

Decision Date17 July 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-0813,95-0813
Citation676 So.2d 526
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D1647 Robert T. ADAMS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Karen ADAMS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

William C. Purcell, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Harry G. Carratt of Morgan, Carratt and O'Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee/cross-appellant.

POLEN, Judge.

Former husband Robert Adams appeals a final judgment granting a downward modification of his child support obligations. Former wife Karen Adams cross-appeals from a later judgment entered after the notice of appeal was filed. We find no error in the points raised by the husband, but reverse and remand on the wife's cross-appeal.

On May 22, 1995, while this appeal was pending, the trial court granted the husband's motion for further downward modification by terminating his obligation to pay $108.00 per month for his son's health insurance. The court terminated the payment, as Mr. Adams had placed the child on his insurance coverage through work.

The trial court was without jurisdiction to further modify the final judgment while the order granting modification was on appeal. Floyd v. Floyd, 500 So.2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). In Floyd, the trial court modified a dissolution order while an appeal of that order was pending. Id. at 318. The court reversed those orders stating:

A trial judge is without jurisdiction to alter an order or judgment once an appeal from that order or judgment has been filed. Johnson v. Ferguson, 383 So.2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Gross v. Simanonok, 366 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Id.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Salgado v. Suyapa-Jimenez, 3D17-1286
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 22, 2018
    ...forth the parties' parenting plan while an appeal of the final order was pending before the appellate court); Adams v. Adams, 676 So.2d 526, 526-27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (concluding the trial court was without jurisdiction to modify child support obligations awarded in a final judgment after ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT