Adams v. City of Jackson

Decision Date09 May 2023
Docket Number2021-CC-00454-COA
PartiesRAKASHA ADAMS APPELLANT v. CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
CourtMississippi Court of Appeals

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2021

COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT HON. ISADORE W. PATRICK JR. TRIAL JUDGE:

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: MICHAEL VERDIER CORY JR.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: CARRIE JOHNSON

BEFORE BARNES, C.J., LAWRENCE AND EMFINGER, JJ.

LAWRENCE, J.

¶1. Rakasha Adams was an officer with the Jackson Police Department. During one shift, after witnessing a vehicle run a stop sign and force another vehicle off the road, Officer Adams initiated blue lights to conduct a traffic stop. The vehicle did not immediately stop. Officer Adams followed behind the vehicle for 1.23 miles for approximately four minutes, traveling between ten and twenty miles per hour. The vehicle eventually ran into another patrol vehicle assisting Officer Adams. After the officers exited their vehicles, the driver attempted to strike the assisting officer. As a result, both officers fired their weapons at the car, and the driver was killed. Jackson Police Department suspended both officers for ninetydays without pay for engaging in a "pursuit" while Jackson had a "no-pursuit policy."

Adams appealed to the Civil Service Commission, and after a hearing, the Commission affirmed the suspension. After the circuit court affirmed the Commission's decision, Officer Adams appealed and alleges before this Court that the Commission's decision was made without substantial evidence and was arbitrary and capricious. We agree that the Commission's decision was contrary to the substantial evidence, arbitrary, and capricious, and we reverse the circuit court's judgment confirming that decision. We remand the case to the Commission for a determination of restitution consistent with this opinion.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS

¶2. On January 27, 2018, Adams saw a red Pontiac G6 run a stop sign and cause a black Nissan to run off the road while she was on patrol in a residential area in Jackson. After checking on the individuals in the Nissan and ensuring their safety, she turned on her blue lights and followed the red Pontiac to initiate a traffic stop. The Pontiac driver did not pull over but continued to drive at a slow speed between ten and twenty miles per hour for approximately four minutes or 1.23 miles. During that time, Adams radioed dispatch to run the Pontiac tag and discovered the Pontiac had not been stolen and belonged to Crystalline Barnes. Adams also radioed Corporal Albert Taylor,[1] who was on patrol nearby, and asked him to "assist" her with "pulling over the car." Taylor assisted and positioned his patrol car behind Adams and began to follow Adams. At some point as they approached a traffic light Taylor was separated from Adams and the Pontiac. Adams and the Pontiac made it through the intersection on the green light, but it changed to red for Taylor. He stopped at the light and waited for the light to turn green again. Once the traffic light changed to green, Taylor continued and found Adams and the Pontiac at the end of a residential street. The Pontiac accelerated and ran into Taylor's patrol car head-on. Both Adams and Taylor got out of their patrol cars and saw the Pontiac accelerate again, but this time it went toward Taylor in what both officers thought was an attempt to run Taylor over. In response, Adams and Taylor fired their weapons at the Pontiac. The Pontiac's driver, Barnes, was killed. A Hinds County grand jury returned a no true bill as to the officers' actions during the shooting. However the Jackson Police Department concluded Adams (and Taylor) violated the Jackson Police Department's "no-pursuit policy" and suspended both officers for ninety days without pay. Adams appealed the disciplinary action to the City of Jackson's Civil Service Commission (Commission),[2] and on February 14, 2019, the Commission held a hearing.

¶3. During the Commission hearing, Adams was the first to testify. She testified that she started her patrol shift around 6:45 a.m. or 7:00 a.m., and around 7:20 a.m. she "saw the red Pontiac G6 [make a wide turn and] run the stop sign[,] . . . [which ran a black] Nissan off the roadway . . . onto the grass and onto the curb." Adams checked on the occupants of the Nissan, and both occupants said they were okay and asked her "to go get the people that were driving carelessly." Adams said that she reversed her patrol car to follow the Pontiac, but by the time she got to the road, the Pontiac was already at the end of the road. She then initiated her blue lights, but the Pontiac did not stop. Instead, "the car [made] a rolling stop at the stop sign and turn[ed] and [made] a left-hand turn." Adams explained that she was unable to see the Pontiac driver because of the dark tint, and she "called out" to dispatch to "run a tag." Adams said that Sergeant Geraldine Green intervened and asked her "what I have" and "what's [my] speed." Adams said she explained what happened and when she told Green her speed, fifteen to twenty miles per hour, Green became "silent."[3] Dispatch ran the tag and told Adams that Crystalline Barnes was the owner of the Pontiac and the car had not been stolen. Adams said the Pontiac made one left-hand turn during this exchange.

¶4. Adams also testified that she radioed Corporal Taylor and asked him to help her conduct a traffic stop of the Pontiac. She said Taylor followed behind her, but they were separated when Taylor stopped at a red traffic light. Adams said the Pontiac started to weave, "[and] I'm thinking . . . maybe this is someone in the car that's . . . intoxicated or maybe sick or whatever, so I'm still following the vehicle." She said she was assessing the scene:

[T]he car was driving in a careless manner and traveling at low speed; and the car started to weave over the roadway. So I don't know what is wrong with this driver[,] . . . [but I'm] making a routine traffic stop.

¶5. Adams also testified that she was not involved in a pursuit because she was not attempting to make an arrest or apprehend a suspect. She stated, "just because I was trying to pull the car over, that doesn't mean that I was trying to apprehend anyone or take her to jail." Adams further explained she could have "given [the driver] a talk or wrote a ticket" because it was a routine traffic stop for careless driving. Specifically, the following exchange occurred during Adams's examination:

CORY:[4] If we keep looking at this, it talks about the vehicle pursuit, the officers attempting to apprehend the suspect, and then it goes on to say who is trying to avoid arrest by driving a motor vehicle. Did you at any point think that the driver of the red Pontiac was trying to avoid arrest?
ADAMS: No, sir.
CORY: Why not? What are the things you are thinking, again?
ADAMS: When I see somebody trying to avoid arrest, I think of somebody intentionally speeding away from me or running away from me, fighting me, doing something in a violent manner to get away from me.
....
COMMISSIONER
ESTER STOKES
(STOKES): [T]ell this Commission what had you planned to do.
ADAMS: I mean, when you are doing a traffic stop, right, when you're doing a traffic, does every car you pull over you take to jail?
STOKES: You know that ain't the truth.
ADAMS: Exactly.
STOKES: Right. What are you saying as it relates to your case?
ADAMS: As it relates to my case, I do traffic stops all the time. I write more tickets than I do anything.

¶6. Adams also acknowledged knowing the "no-pursuit policy," which was admitted into evidence. She admitted that Jackson Police Department (JPD) policies define a "Vehicular Pursuit" as

[a]n event involving one or more law enforcement officers attempting to apprehend a suspect who is trying to avoid arrest by driving a motor vehicle. In this attempt to avoid arrest, the suspect may drive at high speeds or may attempt other evasive driving actions. The suspect may also simply drive in a legal manner, but fail to yield or stop for an officer's emergency lights and sirens.

¶7. Adams testified it is understood among officers that some civilians will not immediately stop for blue lights but travel to an area where they feel safe before stopping. She stated,

They may not feel safe at that time. They may be going to their house to park their vehicle because they don't want their vehicle towed.... There are plenty of reasons. If you are working on the night shift, it may be too dark in that area, and they may be going to a store. There are plenty of reasons that a car is not going to stop as soon as you flip your blue lights.

Adams also said the Pontiac's behavior was not evasive even though the driver did not immediately stop. She testified the time between the moment she initiated the blue lights and the moment the Pontiac stopped was about four minutes (1.23 miles). She further stated the entire distance of 1.23 miles was traveled at low speeds between ten and twenty miles per hour. Adams further explained the driver could have been experiencing a diabetic situation, and "when drivers are like that, they don't know that a vehicle is behind them." Adams said JPD does not allow officers "to call an ambulance until we actually know . . . the situation that we have." She also stated that JPD did not provide any training or detail regarding how long an officer should flash the blue lights before terminating a traffic stop if the driver does not stop. She explained that based on her training and reading and understanding of the policy, the officers must "assess the situation" and make a "judgment call" to determine when a routine traffic stop escalates to a pursuit.

¶8. Finally, Adams testified that her ninety-day suspension was...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT