Adams v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 607
Decision Date | 14 January 1960 |
Docket Number | No. 607,607 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | C. Robert ADAMS v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. |
Rollins & Rollins, Greensboro, for plaintiff, appellant.
McLendon, Brim, Holderness & Brooks by L. P. McLendon, Jr., and C. T. Leonard, Jr., Greensboro, for defendant, appellee.
On 10 November 1958, plaintiff bought from one of defendant's stores a box of Kellogg's Corn Flakes in a sealed package. On the morning of 14 November 1958, while eating in his home a bowl of corn flakes taken from this package, he bit down on something very hard, breaking off part of an eyetooth. The breaking of the tooth exposed a nerve, causing him considerable pain. The same morning he had the rest of the tooth extracted.
When he bit on this object, he spit it out, examined it, and found that it was a little brown, hard, crystal-like object. A chemical analysis of this object showed that it was part of a grain of corn that had partially been crystalized. It had been reduced from its normal state of a grain of corn to a state as hard as a piece of quartz. He had never seen any particle of this size in corn flakes before.
Plaintiff testified on cross-examination:
We held in Rabb v. Covington, 215 N.C. 572, 2 S.E.2d 705, that when a retail merchant sells food in a sealed package to a customer there is an implied warranty of fitness for human consumption. In this case the 'wieners' or sausages sold were in a casing, which plaintiff conceded constituted a sealed container, and had in them pieces of metal. Upon authority of Rabb v. Covington, a nonsuit was held improper in Williams v. Elson, 218 N.C. 157, 10 S.E.2d 668, where defendant sold plaintiff for consumption a barbecued beef sandwich containing glass. In Davis v. Radford, 233 N.C. 283, 63 S.E.2d 822, 24 A.L.R.2d 906, plaintiff sued Radford, a retail druggist, for breach of an implied warranty of wholesomeness in the sale to his intestate of an article for human consumption known as 'Westsal,' a salt substitute, which he alleged contained poisonous ingredients. In this case the Court recognized as applicable the doctrine of implied warranty.
Defendant in its brief states: .'
In the Cavanagh case the article sold was a rubber stopper to be used in bottles containing gas charged or carbonated beverages. The Court held that the seller did not, by virtue of statutory implied warranty of fitness for intended use, become an insurer that the stopper could be used with absolute safety, and stopper was not required to be perfectly adapted for its intended use but only reasonably fit therefor.
Plaintiff's case is based upon the presence in the corn flakes he was eating of part of a grain of corn that had partially been crystalized, and thereby reduced from its normal state of a grain of corn to a state as hard as quartz, that is the presence of a substance natural to the corn flakes, and not removed therefrom in the process of its preparation for human consumption, and he contends that this constituted a breach of defendant's implied warranty of reasonable fitness of the corn flakes for human consumption. His is not a case of a foreign object, like glass, a piece of metal, etc., in the corn flakes, or of the corn flakes being decayed, diseased, or in a spoiled and poisonous condition.
Defendant contends that its implied warranty only extends to cases where foreign matter is contained in the food, or where the food is diseased, decayed, or otherwise in a spoiled or poisonous condition, and does not extend to the facts here.
Plaintiff states in his brief 'there was no evidence presented on the composition of the cereal.' However, plaintiff introduced in evidence the package bearing the label 'Kellogg's Corn Flakes,' which he bought from defendant. Webster's New International Dictionary, 2nd Ed., gives this definition of cereal: In our opinion, plaintiff's evidence shows these corn flakes were made from corn.
36 C.J.S. Foreign, pp. 1247-1248, defines foreign substance: 'A substance occurring in any part of the body or organism where it is not normally found, usually introduced from without.' A sliver of bone in a pork chop was held not a foreign substance to a pork chop in Brown v. Nebiker, 229 Iowa 1223, 296 N.W. 366.
In Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co., 6 Cal.2d 674, 59 P.2d 144, 147, plaintiff was injured by swallowing a fragment of chicken bone, while eating a chicken pie at a restaurant. The Supreme Court sitting in bank, while agreeing that there was an implied warranty of fitness on such a sale by a restaurateur by virtue of their Uniform Sales Act, held that such a warranty was not breached by the presence of the bone in the chicken pie. The Court said:
The holding of the Supreme Court in th...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
...Tea Room (1964) 347 Mass. 421, 198 N.E.2d 309 [no recovery for injury from fish bone in fish chowder]; Adams v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1960) 251 N.C. 565, 112 S.E.2d 92, 94 [no recovery for injuries caused by grain of corn in box of corn flakes]; Coffer v. Standard Brands, Inc. 3......
-
Cabán v. R Seafood, Civil No. 14–1507(GAG).
...were not unmerchantable under the foreign-natural test since bacteria are natural to the shellfish); Adams v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 251 N.C. 565, 112 S.E.2d 92, 98 (1960) (concluding that a consumer can be expected to anticipate a crystallized grain of corn in a box of corn flakes); Go......
-
Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.
...warranty should have survived Wendy's motion for a directed verdict. Wendy's, relying on this Court's decision in Adams v. Tea Co., 251 N.C. 565, 112 S.E.2d 92 (1960), contends that plaintiff's claim for breach of implied warranty must fail because the bone was "natural" to the foodstuff. I......
- State v. Shelton