Adams v. Lancaster.

Decision Date10 November 2003
Docket NumberNo. 03-356.,03-356.
Citation540 U.S. 1004
PartiesADAMS, WARDEN v. LANCASTER.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 324 F. 3d 423.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Wilson v. Parker
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • January 29, 2008
    ... ... Lancaster v. Adams, 324 F.3d 423, 429 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1004, 124 S.Ct. 535, 157 L.Ed.2d 409 (2003). The proper inquiry for the ... ...
  • Keith v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • July 10, 2006
    ... ... Lancaster v. Adams, 324 F.3d 423, 429 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1004, 124 S.Ct. 535, 157 L.Ed.2d 409 (2003). The proper inquiry for the ... ...
  • Holloway v. Horn
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • January 22, 2004
    ... ... See Lancaster v. Adams, 324 F.3d 423, 434 (6th Cir.2003) ("Where purposeful discrimination has occurred, to conclude that the subsequent selection of an ... ...
  • Alexander v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • October 29, 2004
    ... ...         The procedural rule in question here is the contemporaneous-objection rule, which is enforced in Michigan. Lancaster v. Adams, 324 F.3d 423, 437 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1004, 124 S.Ct. 535, 157 L.Ed.2d 409 (2003). Petitioner violated the rule by ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT