Adams v. State

Decision Date20 December 1927
PartiesADAMS et al. v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Error to Circuit Court, Brevard County; W. W. Wright, Judge.

Pearl Adams, Mayme Adams, Carrie Lee Jones, and Gladys Jones bring error.

Writ of error dismissed.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

Writ of error returnable 16 days after it was issued and dated is void, and must be dismissed (Rev. Gen. St. 1920, §§ 2908, 6149). A writ of error made returnable 16 days after it was issued and dated is contrary to the statute and void, confers no jurisdiction upon this court, and must be dismissed.

COUNSEL

Hartridge & Patterson, of West Palm Beach, and Fullerton & Bass, of New Smyrna, for plaintiffs in error.

Fred H. Davis, Atty. Gen., and H. E. Carter, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

OPINION

BROWN, J.

The writ of error in this case was issued and dated June 13, 1927, and made returnable June 29, 1927. Writs of error in criminal cases must be issued and made returnable as the like writs in civil cases. Section 6149, Rev. Gen. Stats. All writs of error are required by the statute to be made returnable to a day, either in term time or vacation, more than 30 days, and not more than 90 days, from the date of the writ. Section 2908, Rev. Gen. Stats. A writ of error made returnable contrary to law is void, and does not give to this court jurisdiction of the cause. The fact that the Attorney General has not moved to dismiss the writ of error does not make the writ as issued effective. An express or implied appearance is of no avail in such case, and the writ will be dismissed by the appellate court of its own motion. Savannah, Florida & W. Ry. Co. v. Justice, 41 Fla. 508, 26 So. 704; Rye v. Banks, 66 Fla. 434, 63 So. 825; Anderson v. State, 73 Fla. 86, 74 So. 6; Law v. Zimmerman, 87 Fla. 421, 100 So. 528; Griffith v. Henderson, 52 Fla. 507, 42 So. 705; McJunkins v. Stevens, 88 Fla. 559, 102 So. 756; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hartley (Fla.) 109 So. 421. As the writ of error in this case was made returnable 16 days after it was issued and dated, it confers no jurisdiction of the subject-matter upon this court, and must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

ELLIS, C.J., and STRUM, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur in the opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 29, 1934
    ...appeal is made returnable to a day that is not authorized by the statute. Griffith v. Henderson, 52 Fla. 507, 42 So. 705; Adams v. State, 94 Fla. 1156, 115 So. 530; Stovall v. Stovall, 77 Fla. 116, 80 So. An entry of appeal that is defective only as to parties may be cured by appearances in......
  • Provident Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Devito
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 7, 1929
    ...by the court sua sponte. Griffith v. Henderson, 52 Fla. 507, 42 So. 705; Anderson v. State, 73 Fla. 86, 74 So. 6.' Adams v. State, 94 Fla. 1156, 115 So. 530; v. Zimmerman, 87 Fla. 421, 100 So. 528; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hartley, 92 Fla. 237, 109 So. 421. The provisions of chapter 11890, A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT