Adams v. State, s. 94-2650
| Decision Date | 07 February 1996 |
| Docket Number | 94-2992,Nos. 94-2650,s. 94-2650 |
| Citation | 669 So.2d 284 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D335 Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr., Judge.
Anthony Adams, in pro per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paul Gayle-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Anthony Adams appeals an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We conclude that the second element of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), has not been satisfied, namely, even if defense counsel had taken the additional steps identified in appellant's motion, there is no reasonable probability that the trial outcome would have been different. See 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. at 2068.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lanier v. State, 96-2631
...U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), which govern claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. E.g., Adams v. State, 669 So.2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State v. Oisorio, 657 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), approved, 676 So.2d 1363 (Fla.1996); Martinez v. State, 655 So.2d 166 (F......