Adams v. State, 80-638

Decision Date27 August 1980
Docket NumberNo. 80-638,80-638
Citation387 So.2d 498
PartiesDon Alton ADAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Don Alton Adams, pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward M. Chew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

ORFINGER, Judge.

Adams alleges in his petition for writ of habeas corpus that he was placed on probation for five years conditioned on his serving one year in the Brevard County Jail. He asserts that he is entitled to statutory gain time as a county prisoner. 1

The flaw in this argument is that the imposition of a short term of imprisonment as a special condition of probation is not a "sentence." State v. Williams, 237 So.2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970); Bracey v. State, 356 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

. . . Thus there is a clear distinction between a sentence on the one hand, which must be preceded by an adjudication of guilt, and conditions of probation on the other hand, which can be imposed independently of an adjudication of guilt and imposition or pronouncement of sentence. (Emphasis in original.) Williams, supra, at 70.

Rule 3.790, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, prohibits pronouncement and imposition of sentence of imprisonment upon a defendant who is to be placed on probation regardless of whether the defendant has or has not been adjudicated guilty. Trial courts have general authority to require incarceration as a condition of probation for felony offenses pursuant to the general condition provisions of section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1979). State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18, 24 (Fla.1976).

In this case the order of probation does not constitute the imposition of sentence necessitating the application of section 951.21(1).

Petition DENIED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and SHARP, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Van Tassel v. Coffman, 68037
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1985
    ...William v. Lamar, 414 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Heatherington v. State, 388 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Adams v. State, 387 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The First District Court of Appeal held in Bracey v. State, 356 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), that jail time as a condition of......
  • Heatherington v. State, 79-811
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 15, 1980
    ...Apparently Depson involved a straight time term of years, whereas the confinement here was as a condition of probation. Adams v. State, 387 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), holds that confinement as a condition of probation is not a sentence within the meaning of the statute, section 951.21(1......
  • Hewett v. State, 80-606
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 1, 1980
    ...and Phillip D. Havens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Petition DENIED on the authority of Adams v. State, 387 So.2d 498, (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). ORFINGER, FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and SHARP, JJ., ...
  • William v. Lamar, 82-542
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 1982
    ...as a condition of probation, as it is not a "sentence." Heatherington v. State, 388 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Adams v. State, 387 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The petition for mandamus DENIED. FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT