Adams v. Texas Compensation Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 09 November 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 17208,17208 |
Citation | 573 S.W.2d 612 |
Parties | George A. ADAMS, Appellant, v. TEXAS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. (1st Dist.) |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Thomas J. Pearson, Bellaire, for appellant.
Weitinger, Steelhammer & Tucker, Jack W. Tucker, Jr., Houston, for appellee.
This is an appeal by George Adams, the claimant in a worker's compensation case, from a judgment entered in favor of Texas Compensation Insurance Company setting aside an award of the Texas Industrial Accident Board.
The appellant did not file a Statement of Facts with this court.
In appellant's one point of error he contends that the trial court erred in ruling that there was no showing of good cause excusing his failure to give notice of his injury within thirty days as required by the Worker's Compensation Act.
Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. Article 8307, Section 4a (1967).
In response to special issues the jury found that the plaintiff has been injured in the course of his employment and had thereby suffered a partial incapacity. It further found that within six months from the date of such injury he believed his injury to be trivial and that such belief caused him to delay filing his claim for compensation. The jury failed to find, however, that the appellant's employer had notice of the injury within 30 days after its occurrence. On the basis of the jury's verdict the trial court entered judgment setting aside the award of the Texas Industrial Accident Board and decreeing that Adams take nothing on his claim against Texas Compensation Insurance Company.
The appellant had the burden of proving that good cause existed for his failure to give notice within the required thirty day period. Hawkins v. Safety Cas. Co., 146 Tex. 381, 207 S.W.2d 370 (1948); Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hardin, 252 S.W.2d 752 (Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth, writ ref'd.). It is his contention that the jury's finding that he believed his injury to be trivial "within six (6) months from the date of such injury" established the element of good cause, excusing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Ramos
...issue of "general injury" deemed in favor of judgment of recovery where no objection was made to nonsubmission). Finally, in Adams v. Texas Compensation Ins. Co., the plaintiff did not object to omission of an issue concerning his claim that good cause existed for his failure to provide not......