Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Imeisha P. (In re Syncere R.)

Decision Date02 December 2020
Docket NumberN-3513-18,N-3512-18,N-3514-18,N-3515-18, N-3517-18,N-3518-18,N-3516-18,N-3511-18,Docket Nos. N-3510-18,2019–09761
Citation133 N.Y.S.3d 454 (Mem),189 A.D.3d 845
Parties In the MATTER OF SYNCERE R. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Sir'Vonte S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Alyijah S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3) In the Matter of Aiden S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 4) In the Matter of Amari S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 5) In the Matter of Tahjir S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 6) In the Matter of Amir C.S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 7) In the Matter of Nyasia J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 8) In the Matter of Nyomi P. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Respondent v. Imeisha P. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 9)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Kyle Sosebee, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Jane L. Gordon and MacKenzie Fillow of counsel), for respondent.

Jeffrey C. Bluth, New York, NY, attorney for the children Syncere R., Sir'Vonte S., Alyijah S., Aiden S., Amari S., Tahjir S., and Amir C. S.

Robert Marinelli, New York, NY, attorney for the child Nyasia J.

Christine Theodore, Spring Valley, NY, attorney for the child Nyomi P.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, ROBERT J. MILLER, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Barnett, J.), dated July 16, 2019. The order, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother neglected the child Nyasia J., and derivatively neglected the other subject children.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced these related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, alleging that the mother neglected the subject child Nyasia J., and derivatively neglected the other subject children. Following a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that a preponderance of the evidence established that the mother neglected Nyasia J., and derivatively neglected the other children. The mother appeals.

At a fact-finding hearing in a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner has the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject child has been abused or neglected (see Family Ct Act § 1046[b][i] ; Matter of Tammie Z., 66 N.Y.2d 1, 3, 494 N.Y.S.2d 686, 484 N.E.2d 1038 ; Matter of Brianna M. [Corbert G.], 152 A.D.3d 600, 58 N.Y.S.3d 534 ; Matter of Desiree P. [Michael H.], 149 A.D.3d 841, 49 N.Y.S.3d 924 ). The Family Court's findings with respect to credibility are entitled to great weight (see Matter of Brianna M. [Corbert G.], 152 A.D.3d at 601, 58 N.Y.S.3d 534 ; Matter of Monica M. [Mary M.], 151 A.D.3d 1705, 56 N.Y.S.3d 739 ; Matter of Jamel T. [Gemayel T.], 120 A.D.3d 504, 989 N.Y.S.2d 908 ).

Here, a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing established that the mother neglected Nyasia J. by using excessive corporal punishment (see Family Ct Act 1012[f][i][B] ; Matter of Michele S. [Yi S.], 157 A.D.3d 551, 67 N.Y.S.3d 628 ; Matter of Genesis F. [Xiomaris S.], 121 A.D.3d 526, 994 N.Y.S.2d 341 ; Matter of James S. [Kathleen S.], 88 A.D.3d 1006, 931 N.Y.S.2d 524 ). Moreover, since the mother's conduct toward Nyasia J. demonstrated a fundamental defect in her understanding of parental duties relating to the care of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT