Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Curtis G. (In re Boobacar R.)
| Citation | 132 N.Y.S.3d 687 (Mem),188 A.D.3d 1073 |
| Decision Date | 18 November 2020 |
| Docket Number | 2019–10254,Docket Nos. N–6968–18, N–6969–18,2019–10252 |
| Parties | In the MATTER OF BOOBACAR R. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; v. Curtis G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant.(Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Malia G. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; v. Curtis G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant. (Proceeding No. 2) |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
188 A.D.3d 1073
132 N.Y.S.3d 687 (Mem)
In the MATTER OF BOOBACAR R. (Anonymous).
Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent;
v.
Curtis G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant.(Proceeding No. 1)
In the Matter of Malia G. (Anonymous).
Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent;
v.
Curtis G. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)
2019–10252
2019–10254
Docket Nos. N–6968–18, N–6969–18
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Submitted—October 9, 2020
November 18, 2020
Christine Theodore, Spring Valley, NY, for respondent-appellant.
James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Daniel Matza–Brown and Jesse A. Townsend of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Dawne A. Mitchell and John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the children.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Curtis G. appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Erik S. Pitchal, J.), dated May 1, 2019, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated May 31, 2019. The order of fact-finding, after a fact-finding hearing, found that Curtis G. neglected the subject children. The order of disposition, after a dispositional hearing, inter alia, released the subject children to the custody of the nonrespondent mother under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of six months and placed Curtis G. under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order of fact-finding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition and is brought up for review on the appeal from the order of disposition; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as released the subject children to the custody of the nonrespondent mother under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of six months
and placed Curtis G. under the supervision of the Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dutchess Cnty. Dep't of Cmty. & Family Servs. v. Tianna S. (In re Skye H.), 2019–01017, 2019–13026
...expired by its own terms (see Matter of Jermaine T. [Jairam T.], 193 A.D.3d 943, 146 N.Y.S.3d 662 ; Matter of Boobacar R. [Curtis G.], 188 A.D.3d 1073, 132 N.Y.S.3d 687 ; Matter of Eternity S. [Vanessa P.], 183 A.D.3d 748, 122 N.Y.S.3d 667 ). Furthermore, Skye is now 18 years old and is no ......
-
Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Meuris P. (In re Silveris P.), 2020–02472
...order have expired (see Matter of Jermaine T. [Jairam T.], 193 A.D.3d 943, 945, 146 N.Y.S.3d 662 ; Matter of Boobacar R. [Curtis G.], 188 A.D.3d 1073, 1074, 132 N.Y.S.3d 687 ). However, since the adjudication of neglect constitutes a permanent and significant stigma that might indirectly af......
-
Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Monica M. (In re Serena G.), 2021–01447
...for a neglect finding" ( Matter of Skye H. [Tianna S.], 195 A.D.3d 711, 714, 149 N.Y.S.3d 535 ; see Matter of Boobacar R. [Curtis G.], 188 A.D.3d 1073, 1075, 132 N.Y.S.3d 687 ; Matter of Kiara C. [David C.], 85 A.D.3d 1025, 1026, 926 N.Y.S.2d 566 ). However, with respect to the petition all......
-
In re Serena G., 2021-01447
...may be sufficient for a neglect finding" (Matter of Skye H. [Tianna S.], 195 A.D.3d 711, 714; see Matter of Boobacar R. [Curtis G.], 188 A.D.3d 1073, 1075; Matter of Kiara C. [David C.], 85 A.D.3d 1025, 1026). However, with respect to the petition alleging derivative neglect as to Vincent, ......