Advance Mach. Co. v. Berry, 79-1347
| Decision Date | 27 November 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1347,79-1347 |
| Citation | 378 So.2d 26 |
| Parties | ADVANCE MACHINE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Kenneth BERRY, a minor, etc., et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, Tutan, O'Hara & McCoy and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.
Peters, Pickle, Flynn, Niemoeller, Stieglitz & Hart and Cecyl L. Pickle, Herskowitz & Grossman and Jack Herskowitz, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
The question on this appeal is whether this cause should be governed by Section 607.297, Florida Statutes (1977), which provides that claims against a dissolved corporation should be commenced within three years, or governed by the statutes of Missouri, the home State of the voluntarily dissolved corporation, which provided that such causes of action expired after a two-year period.
We hold that when a foreign corporation voluntarily dissolves itself such voluntary act shall not diminish the provisions in Section 607.297, Florida Statutes (1977), calling for a three-year "winding up" period. Under the complaint, the plaintiff alleged a tort claim which would have had a normal existence of four years. See: Section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1977). However, because the defendant corporation was dissolved, the public policy of Florida, as announced by its Legislature, was to diminish the time within which any such complaint could be brought to a period of three years. The action of the defendant corporation, in voluntarily dissolving itself in its home State, could not reduce the period below the three-year "winding up" period provided for by Florida Statutes. To do so would permit a foreign corporation, which had done business in this State, to escape the effects of its tortious conduct 1 after the expiration of only two years when the Florida law provided that liability should exist for at least three years. If the foreign corporation desired to take the benefits of doing business in Florida, then it should be subject to the same limitations as applicable to a domestic corporation upon dissolution.
Therefore, the order denying the motion to quash is affirmed.
Affirmed.
1 We note that Section 607.297, Florida Statutes (1977) only applies to " . . . any right or claim existing, or any liability incurred, prior to such dissolution . . . ." The act complained of in this action accrued subsequent to the date of dissolution...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Highway Equipment Co.
...the case Highway cited in support of its argument that the limitations law of the location of the claim controls, Advance Machine Co. v. Berry, 378 So.2d 26, 27 (Fla. App.1980), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980), is neither controlling nor persuasive here. In that case, the court held......
-
McGlynn v. Rosen, 79-2216
...of limitations has not yet run on the claim, the corporation cannot initiate an action in court. See generally Advance Machine Co. v. Berry, 378 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In any event, the general statute of limitations relied upon by appellants would not alter the disposition of this ca......
- Advance Machine Co. v. Kenneth Berry