Aetna Finance Co. v. Ables, 17909
Decision Date | 01 December 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 17909,17909 |
Parties | AETNA FINANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Larry B. ABLES, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
This is another case in which is made obvious the erroneous opinion of the general public that when there has been repossession of retail commodities (which constitute security for indebtedness) because of failure to make the contracted installment payments to the vendor (or his assignee) on the strength of the mortgage, all reciprocal obligations come to an end so that nothing is thereafter owed either by or to the vendor (or his assignee mortgagee).
Here the vendor's assignee, Aetna Finance Company, repossessed a refrigerator, range, and under-counter dishwasher which had been purchased by Larry B. Ables on March 4, 1975 for $1,286.60, with unpaid balance of $1,200.00 financed and assigned to Aetna Finance Company upon security of the appliances. The indebtedness amount of $1,577.88 (including interest of $377.88) was to be paid by Ables at the monthly rate of $43.83 in order to retire his indebtedness in 36 months, with the first payment due April 5, 1975.
Ables made the payments which fell due in April, May, and June of 1975 but defaulted in July of 1975. With his consent Aetna Finance Company repossessed the appliances. Aetna was shown to have sold these. Having properly applied credits on Ables' note, save for "amounts realized from sale of the appliances by commercially reasonable disposition," Aetna brought suit against Ables for deficiency judgment following sale of the collateral. The amount for which Aetna Finance Company sued was an alleged deficiency of $761.53 plus $500.00 as an attorney's fee.
Trial was to the court without a jury, which rendered judgment that Aetna take nothing from Ables by its suit. Aetna appealed.
We affirm.
Having application to the instant case is what was written by this court in Christian v. First Nat. Bank of Weatherford, 531 S.W.2d 832, 842 (Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.), as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sunjet, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
...v. Mid-Continent Refrigerator Company, 579 S.W.2d 545, 548-49, (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Aetna Finance Company v. Ables, 559 S.W.2d 139, 140, (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1977, no writ). Our holding is logical because the secured party has a better knowledge of the fa......
-
Ruden v. Citizens Bank and Trust Co. of Maryland
...930 (1979); Investors Acceptance Co. of Livingston v. James Talcott, Inc., 61 Tenn.App. 307, 454 S.W.2d 130 (1969); Aetna Fin. Co. v. Ables, 559 S.W.2d 139 (Tex.Civ.App.1977). See also Richard C. Tinney, Annotation, Failure of Secured Party to Make "Commercially Reasonable" Disposition of C......
-
In re Nardone
...see Atlas Thrift Co. v. Horan, 27 Cal.App.3d 999, 104 Cal.Rptr. 315, 11 U.C.C.Rep.Serv. 417 (3d Dist.1972); Aetna Finance Co. v. Ables, 559 S.W.2d 139 (Tex.Civ.App.1977). These courts believe that the U.C.C. places minimal burdens upon upon the foreclosing secured creditor, concluding that ......
-
Schultz v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
...2 the contention that the disposition was not made in a commercially reasonable manner is not an affirmative defense. Aetna Finance Co. v. Ables, 559 S.W.2d 139, 140 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1977, no writ) (quoting Christian v. First National Bank of Weatherford, 531 S.W.2d 832, 842 (Tex.C......