Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wells, B-7217

Citation566 S.W.2d 900
Decision Date17 May 1978
Docket NumberNo. B-7217,B-7217
PartiesAETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Homer Baxter WELLS, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

George S. Finley, San Angelo, for petitioner.

Trenchard, Davis & Hardwick, Robert Trenchard, Jr. and Calvin W. Wesch, Kermit, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Homer Baxter Wells recovered a judgment against Aetna Life Insurance Company for the amount of certain medical expenses incurred in treatment of a heart attack he sustained while working for the Tom Brown Drilling Company. Aetna had issued a policy to Tom Brown Drilling Company which provided medical benefits for employees' injuries or illnesses which were not covered by worker's compensation insurance. Judgment was rendered for Wells on the jury finding that the heart attack was not an accidental injury. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 557 S.W.2d 144.

Wells and the other employees of Tom Brown Drilling Company were covered for worker's compensation benefits by a policy issued by Highlands Insurance Company. The undisputed evidence establishes that: Wells asserted a claim under the worker's compensation policy in which he contended that the heart attack was an accidental injury; the Industrial Accident Board found that the heart attack was an accidental injury; Highlands Insurance Company appealed to the district court, but, prior to trial, the parties entered into a settlement whereby Wells recovered substantial compensation and reimbursement for the same medical expenses sued on herein. Thus, as a result of the settlement of the worker's compensation claim and the judgment entered in this case, Wells has been permitted to recover twice for the same medical expenses; once because the heart attack was an accidental injury, and once because it was not an accidental injury.

We granted the application for writ of error to consider Aetna's points that Wells was estopped or barred from asserting in this suit that the heart attack was not an accidental injury after successfully claiming in the worker's compensation claim that it was an accidental injury. We sought to determine if Wells was estopped by the first judgment, or by his election of one of two inconsistent remedies. See Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. Huckabee, 558 S.W.2d 863 (Tex.1977); American Savings & Loan Ass'n of Houston v. Musick, 531 S.W.2d 581, 588 (Tex.1975); Benson v. Wanda Petroleum Company, 468 S.W.2d 361 (Tex.1971).

We have determined, after...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Turner v. PV Intern. Corp., 05-87-01123-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 1988
    ...dism'd w.o.j.); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wells, 557 S.W.2d 144, 147 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1977), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 566 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.1978). The allegations made in the cross-action were not made under oath. Further, judicial estoppel bars a party from successfully maintaini......
  • Banta Oilfield Servs., Inc. v. Mewbourne Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 2018
    ...sworn testimony. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wells , 557 S.W.2d 144, 147 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1977), writ ref'd n.r.e. , 566 S.W.2d 900 (Tex. 1978) (per curiam).11 Gruy also filed a motion for summary judgment.12 Originally, Section 56-7-2 stated as follows:A. Any agreement, covenant or p......
  • Bower v. O'Hara
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • April 17, 1985
    ...402, 489 P.2d 65, 67 (1971); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wells, 557 S.W.2d 144, 147 (Tex.Civ.App.1977), writ of error refused, 566 S.W.2d 900, 901 (Tex.1978) (per curiam), and has been applied in federal courts as well. See In re McCoy, 373 F.Supp. 870, 875 (W.D.Tex.1974); Holt v. Southern Ry. C......
  • Estate of Devitt
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 1988
    ...1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wells, 557 S.W.2d 144 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1977), writ ref'd n.r.e., 566 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.1978). Is this will contest, then, a subsequent proceeding or part of the same proceeding? In the early case of Stringfellow v. Early, 40 S.W. 871,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT