Affiliated Professional Services v. South Central Bell Tel. Co.
| Decision Date | 20 October 1980 |
| Citation | 606 S.W.2d 671 |
| Parties | AFFILIATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and L. M. Berry & Co., Defendants-Appellees. 606 S.W.2d 671 |
| Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Jerrold L. Becker, Knoxville, for plaintiffs-appellants.
E. Bruce Foster, Jr., Knoxville, for defendants-appellees; Frantz, McConnell & Seymour, Knoxville, Raymond Whiteaker, Jr., Nashville, of counsel.
In this case both the trial court and the Court of Appeals upheld an exculpatory clause in a contract between appellants and appellees with respect to advertising in the "yellow pages" of a telephone directory.
Appellants, an association of psychologists and social workers, contracted for listings in the classified advertising section of the 1979 Knoxville telephone directory. Their listing was omitted from the "yellow pages," and they filed suit for damages based upon negligence and breach of contract. Appellees, the telephone company and its local soliciting and advertising agent, relied upon language in the printed contract limiting their liability for errors or omissions to the cost of the advertisement. It is undisputed that appellees were not paid any part of the contracted charges and that the charges had been cancelled.
We granted the application of appellants for permission to appeal. Unless modified by the decision of this Court in Olson v. Molzen, 558 S.W.2d 429 (Tenn.1977), the case of Smith v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 51 Tenn.App. 146, 364 S.W.2d 952 (1962), is dispositive of the issues. In the latter case an exculpatory clause similar to that involved here was sustained and liability was limited to the advertising charges.
In Olson v. Molzen, supra, the Court held invalid and contrary to public policy an exculpatory contract signed by a patient as a condition for receiving professional services from an osteopath. The Court noted that Tennessee decisions generally have sustained contracts limiting liability of one or more of the contracting parties, and the Court did not purport to disturb that rule except in limited types of cases discussed in the opinion.
Tennessee has no general statutes declaring contracts of this nature contrary to public policy. There are some specific statutes governing limited areas of commercial activity. Among them is T.C.A. § 62-624, rendering invalid indemnity or hold-harmless clauses in building and construction contracts where exculpation is provided for damages caused by the sole negligence of the promisee or indemnitee. The Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act of 1975 1 prohibits provisions in rental agreements in which the tenant agrees to the exculpation or limitation of the legal liability of the landlord to the tenant. T.C.A. § 64-2813(a)(2). Such provisions have been sustained, however, in rental agreements not falling within the coverage of the statute. Schratter v. Development Enterprises, Inc., 584 S.W.2d 459 (Tenn.App.1979). 2
As pointed out in the briefs of counsel, almost every appellate court which has considered the frequently...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehab. Hosp., LP
...Olson , this Court upheld contractual provisions limiting liability to a sum certain. In Affiliated Professional Services v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. , 606 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tenn. 1980), the Court declined to apply the Olson analysis to a provision in a contract with a telephone comp......
-
Electronic Sec. Systems Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co.
...A. Berjian, D.O., Inc. v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co., 54 Ohio St.2d 147, 375 N.E.2d 410 (1978); Affiliated Professional Services v. South Central Bell Telephone Co., 606 S.W.2d 671 (Tenn.1980); Morris v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co., 658 P.2d 1199 (Utah 1983); Allen v. General T......
-
Discount Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.
...54 Ohio St.2d 147, 375 N.E.2d 410 (1978);Woodburn v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 275 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 1979);Affiliated Professional v. South Central Bell, 606 S.W.2d 671 (Tenn.1980);McClure Eng'r v. Reuben Donnelley Corp., 101 Ill.App.3d 1109, 57 Ill.Dec. 471, 428 N.E.2d 1151 (1981);Roll-Up......
-
Pitt v. Tyree Organization Ltd.
...Caulking Contractors, Inc., 83-286 CA No. 54, 1987 WL 18061, at *3 (Tenn.Ct.App. Oct.9, 1987)(citing Affiliated Professional Services v. South Central Bell 606 S.W.2d 671 (Tenn.1980)). These statutes include Tenn.Code Ann. § 62-6-123 (1997) which provides that an indemnity agreement in cons......