Agee v. Bay Springs Forest Products, Inc., 53751
| Decision Date | 01 September 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 53751,53751 |
| Citation | 419 So.2d 188 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | Willie AGEE v. BAY SPRINGS FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. |
Tullos, Tullos & Tullos, Eugene C. Tullos, Raleigh, for appellant.
Gibbes, Graves, Mullins, Bullock & Ferris, Brooke Ferris, Laurel, for appellee.
Before SUGG, P. J., and HAWKINS and PRATHER, JJ.
Willie Agee has appealed from a denial of permanent partial disability benefits under the Mississippi Workmen's Compensation Act. We affirm.
Mr. Agee, a man of limited education, was employed as a truck driver when he sustained a low back injury because of some heavy lifting. Following conservative medical therapy, an orthopedic surgeon performed a lumbar laminectomy at the L-5 level. Approximately four months later the doctor advised Mr. Agee to return to full-time work, but to protect his back and avoid heavy lifting. The doctor gave him a 5-10% permanent partial disability rating to the body as a whole.
Upon his return to work, his employer assigned him to operate a fork lift at the same wage as before his injury. Thereafter he received two successive wage increases.
This case is on appeal to us from an order of the full commission, affirmed by the circuit judge, denying Mr. Agee permanent partial disability benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
Ordinarily, it should require no argument to persuade any fact-finding body that Mr. Agee, who had undergone surgery, and whose back manifestly is not, and never will be, as strong as it was prior to injury, has suffered at least some loss in wage-earning capacity in his only means of livelihood: low-skilled manual, or semi-manual, labor.
We have a well-settled rule of law, however, that in determining wage-earning capacity in the situation where an injured employee returns to work and receives the same or greater earnings as those prior to his injury, there is created a rebuttable presumption that he has suffered no loss in his wage-earning capacity. See, e.g., Smith v. Picker Service Co., 240 So.2d 454 (Miss. 1970); Wilcher v. D.D. Ballard Construction Co., 187 So.2d 308 (Miss. 1966); Karr v. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co., 216 Miss. 132, 61 So.2d 789 (1953); Dunn, Mississippi Workmen's Compensation Sec. 67 (2d Ed. 1967).
An attorney faced with this fact in preparing his case has every opportunity to rebut the presumption by showing a number of surrounding facts and circumstances that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vail Associates, Inc. v. West
...Kiewit & Sons, 586 P.2d 182 (Alaska 1978); Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc., 290 N.W.2d 753 (Minn.1980); Agee v. Bay Springs Forest Products, Inc., 419 So.2d 188 (Miss.1982); Special Indemnity Fund v. Stockton, 653 P.2d 194 (Okla.1982); Whittaker v. Health-Tex, Inc., 440 A.2d 122 (R.I......
-
Hudspeth Reg'l Ctr. v. Mitchell
...the injury, there is a rebuttable presumption that there is no loss of wage-earning capacity.” Id. (citing Agee v. Bay Springs Forest Prods., Inc., 419 So.2d 188, 189 (Miss.1982) ). However, a claimant establishes a prima facie case of disability when she is able to show that “because of th......
-
General Elec. Co. v. McKinnon, 56697
...(Emphasis added). Wilcher v. D.D. Ballard Construction Co., 187 So.2d 308, 310-311 (Miss.1966). See also, Agee v. Bay Springs Forest Products, Inc., 419 So.2d 188 (Miss.1982). Moreover, this list is certainly not an exclusive one. See Karr v. Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co., 216 Miss. 132, 61 S......
-
International Paper Co. v. Kelley
...capacity exists when post-injury earnings are the same as or exceed that which was earned previous to the injury. Agee v. Bay Springs Forest Products, 419 So.2d 188 (Miss.1982), see also V. Dunn, Mississippi Workers' Compensation Section 67 (3d ed. The evidence shows that claimant experienc......