Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Gonzalez, 94-2393

Decision Date03 July 1995
Docket NumberNo. 94-2393,94-2393
Citation657 So.2d 56
Parties20 Fla. L. Weekly D1571 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellant, v. Ada GONZALEZ, M.D., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Kathryn L. Kasprzak, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Seth Stopek, of Seth Stopek, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Division of Administrative Hearings awarding attorney fees and costs under section 57.111, Florida Statutes, to a medical doctor after the disciplinary action against her was dismissed is REVERSED. The evidence which the hearing officer acknowledged was before the probable cause panel constituted substantial justification for institution of the disciplinary action, but he erroneously determined that this evidence did not constitute substantial justification in light of the Board of Medicine's subsequent dismissal of the proceeding after more evidence was presented. See Gentele v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry, 513 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Department of Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate v. Toledo Realty, Inc., 549 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

BARFIELD, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • McCloskey v. Dep't of Fin. Servs.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2015
    ...probable cause determinations.” Dep't of Health v. Cralle, 852 So.2d 930, 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Ag. for Health Care Admin. v. Gonzalez, 657 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) ). Moreover, the agency cannot establish substantial justification merely by showing that the action was not fri......
  • McCloskey v. Dep't of Fin. Servs.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2015
    ...cause determinations." Dep't of Health v. Cralle, 852 So. 2d 930, 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Ag. for Health Care Admin. v. Gonzalez, 657 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)). Moreover, the agency cannot establish substantial justification merely by showing that the action was not frivolous, ......
  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BD. OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE v. Cralle, 1D02-2807.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 26, 2003
    ...Fish v. Department of Health, Bd. of Dentistry, 825 So.2d 421, 423 (Fla 4th DCA 2002); see also Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Gonzalez, 657 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Gentele v. Department of Prof'l Regulation, Bd. of Optometry, 513 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Kibler v. Department ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT