Ainley v. Am. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 20 December 1900 |
Citation | 84 N.W. 504,113 Iowa 709 |
Parties | AINLEY v. AMERICAN MUT. FIRE INS. CO. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Polk county; W. F. Conrad, Judge.
Action on a promissory note. The defendant appeals from judgment on a directed verdict. Modified.Chas. E. Hunn, for appellant.
Read & Read, for appellee.
The evidence shows conclusively that on the 20th day of April, 1897, the defendant was indebted to the Merchants' & Bankers' Insurance Company, or Theodore F. Getchell, or both, in the sum of $6,000. This was for money advanced for the organization of the defendant company, and premiums on reinsurance. Getchell insists he had no personal interest in the debt, and took the note in suit for the benefit of the Merchants' & Bankers' Insurance Company, and afterwards assigned it to plaintiff, as its secretary. On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the note was executed for the purpose of guarantying the payment of certain certificates held by Getchell. But these certificates merely evidenced a debt of the defendant. The company was organized in October, 1896, and the transaction out of which this controversy arose grew out of the transfer of its control from Getchell and his associates to L. E. Seager and those with him. The article relating to guaranty certificates may be set out: If, then, the amount advanced was represented by these certificates running to Getchell, the company was expressly pledged to repay it, with interest, at such time as the board of directors, in their discretion, might choose. At the time mentioned the guaranty fund was, by amendment, reduced to $20,000, and from the proceeds of new certificates then issued $3,300 of this indebtedness was paid. The purpose of the new board of directors appears...
To continue reading
Request your trial