Air Travel Associates Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines Inc., 72--481
| Decision Date | 14 February 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 72--481,72--481 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | AIR TRAVEL ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Appellee. |
James W. Swain, Miami, Petherbridge, O'Neill & Lindgren, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Fort Lauderdale, Gambrell, Russell, Killorin, Wade & Forbes, and Wayne T. Elliott, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
The issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. The verdict was directed at the close of the plaintiff's case. Final judgment was entered and the plaintiff brings this appeal.
The burden of an appellant upon an appeal from a final judgment entered upon a directed verdict is to demonstrate that there is a proper view of the evidence under which the jury could have found for the appellant. 1 In determining a 'proper view of the evidence', the appellant, as the party moved against, is entitled to all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence as a whole. Hilkmeyer v. Latin American Air Cargo Expediters, Inc., Fla.1957, 94, So.2d 821.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff-appellant, the evidence was briefly as follows. Appellant is a corporation engaged in the travel field. Its president, Robert Brown, has been an employee of the appellee airline since 1953. Brown worked out a travel marketing program whereby clubs would be formed for members of the public, and these clubs would be used in the marketing of trips. Appellant believed that such clubs could be used by the appellee to sell travel. This plan and idea was disclosed to the appellee in confidence for their mutual profit. The appellant filed an outline of its plan in the United States Patent Office, Copyright Division, and deposited two copies with the Library of Congress. Although the plan was rejected by the appellee, Eastern later developed and used a plan of its own using the 'travel club' idea.
Appellant's theory for recovery is based upon its allegations that the appellee has committed a species of business tort in which it has wrongfully appropriated a novel plan belonging to appellant for which appellant ought to be compensated. See Belt v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, 108 F.Supp. 689 (D.D.C.1952), aff'd, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 210 F.2d 706 (1953); John W. Shaw Advertising, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 112 F.Supp. 121 (N.D.Ill.1953). We have not been referred to any case arising in this state which discusses recovery under appellant's theory of the case. Of course, there are many cases holding that a plaintiff may recover for services performed according to a theory of implied contract. Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 158 F.2d 631 (2d Cir. 1946).
It is not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garrido v. Burger King Corp.
...of Copyright Act preemption by claiming that the ideas were disclosed in confidence to Burger King. In Air Travel Assocs., Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 273 So.2d 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), this court noted that a plaintiff must prove that the idea allegedly misappropriated was both secret an......
-
Alevizos v. JOHN D. MACARTHUR FOUNDATION, 97-3215
...in Florida law by Garrido v. Burger King Corp., 558 So.2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). An earlier case, Air Travel Assocs., Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 273 So.2d 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), referenced the cause of action without deciding whether it should apply in Florida. Garrido adopted a body o......
-
Cunningham v. Romano, 72--607
...which could sustain a verdict for the plaintiffs. Bourgeois v. Dade Co., Fla.1957, 99 So.2d 575; Air Travel Associates, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 3. We must consider the answer to the governing question for each plaintiff. The passenger is entitled to have his......
-
Thompson v. Ward Enterprises, 76--73
...reasonable inferences will be drawn in favor of the party against whom the judgment was entered. See Air Travel Associates, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 273 So.2d 3 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). Further, appellee contends that this case is governed by the holding in Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 128 S......