Aira v. State, 90-2553
| Citation | 583 So.2d 419 |
| Decision Date | 01 August 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2553,90-2553 |
| Parties | Jose Reinaldo AIRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 583 So.2d 419, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2011 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Jose Reinaldo Aira appeals the imposition of his sentence based upon a single scoresheet which shows that legal constraint points were calculated by multiplying 36 (the points to be awarded for commission of one offense while under legal restraint) times the two new offenses. We affirm on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), and note conflict with Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Aira also complains that a public defender's fee and statutory costs were imposed upon him as a condition of probation without a special notice being given to him in addition to the statutory notice. Ordinarily, he would be entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard before a public defender's fee is imposed pursuant to Bull v. State, 548 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1989), but in this case, the record reflects that Aira stipulated to the value of the public defender's services. As to the statutorily mandated and liquidated costs, no special notice was required before imposition. Beasley v. State, 580 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991).
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rocker v. State, 93-1449
...reflects that the fees and costs were part of his plea agreement, and thus, notice and a hearing were unnecessary. See Aira v. State, 583 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (finding that it is proper to impose a public defender's lien without notice or an opportunity to be heard where defendant ......
-
Aira v. State
...Atty. Gen. and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent. PER CURIAM. We have for review Aira v. State, 583 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's use of a multiplier in calculating legal constraint points......
- Aira v. State
- Heck-Melnyk v. Ocala Breeders' Sales Co., Inc., HECK-MELNY