Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc.
Decision Date | 17 May 1978 |
Docket Number | No. B-7426,B-7426 |
Citation | 566 S.W.2d 573 |
Parties | AIRBORNE FREIGHT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. CRB MARKETING, INC., Respondent. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Don L. Baker, Austin, for petitioner.
Donald R. Flournoy, Austin, for respondent.
Airborne Freight Corporation against CRB Marketing pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 185. DP This is a suit on a sworn account brought by Attached to the plaintiff's petition were copies of invoices for services rendered and an affidavit from plaintiff's collection manager that the claim was just and true, that it was due, and that all just and lawful credits had been allowed. The defendant CRB answered only by an unsworn denial. At trial, Airborne Freight introduced evidence bearing only on the issue of reasonable attorney's fees. After a nonjury hearing, the county court at law rendered judgment in favor of Airborne Freight for $1,063.12, representing the principal debt, attorney's fees, and interest. Upon CRB's appeal, the court of civil appeals reversed and rendered judgment that Airborne Freight take nothing. 561 S.W.2d 37. It held that no evidence supported the judgment because the sworn account was not formally offered in evidence. Airborne Freight now contends that the sworn account filed in accordance with Rule 185 is itself evidence to support the trial court's judgment without the necessity of introducing it into evidence.
Rule 185 provides in part:
When any action or defense is founded upon an open account or other claim for goods, wares and merchandise, including any claim for a liquidated money demand based upon written contract or founded on business dealings between the parties, or is for personal service rendered, or labor done or labor or materials furnished, on which a systematic record has been kept, and is supported by the affidavit of the party, his agent or attorney taken before some officer authorized to administer oaths, to the effect that such claim is, within the knowledge of affiant, just and true, that it is due, and that all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits have been allowed, the same shall be taken as prima facie evidence thereof, unless the party resisting such claim shall, before an announcement of ready for trial in said cause, file a written denial, under oath, stating that each and every item is not just or true, or that some specified item or items are not just and true; . . . . When the opposite party fails to file such affidavit, he shall not be permitted to deny the claim, or any item therein, as the case may be. (Emphasis added).
It is settled that if the defendant fails to file a written denial under oath and in the form provided, he will not be permitted to dispute receipt of the items or services or the correctness of the stated charges. Wilson v. Browning Arms Co., 501 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1973, writ ref'd). The defendant may, however, assert defenses in the nature of confession and avoidance without filing a sworn denial if they are properly pleaded. Jorrie Furniture Co. v. Rohm, 442 S.W.2d 476 (Tex.Civ.App. San Antonio 1969, no writ). Of course, a sworn account is not prima facie evidence of the debt as against a stranger to the transaction. Hilton v. Musebeck Shoe Co., 505 S.W.2d 341 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1974, writ ref'd n. r. e.).
The answer filed by CRB did not plead any affirmative defenses or raise the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McNeal v. Thomas, No. 13-03-347-CV (TX 2/17/2005)
... ... or treated as traditional motion); see also Oasis Oil Corp. v. Koch Ref. Co., 60 S.W.3d 248, 250 (Tex. App.-Corpus ... Id. at 792; Straitway Transp., Inc. v. Mundorf, 6 S.W.3d 734, 741 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi ... ...
-
Sundance Resources, Inc. v. Dialog Wireline Services, L.L.C., No. 06-08-00137-CV (Tex. App. 4/8/2009)
...Tank & Equip., Inc., 738 S.W.2d 299, 302 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (quoting Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Mktg., Inc., 566 S.W.2d 573, 574 (Tex. 1978)). Essentially, failure to file a sworn denial of a verified account "amounts to an admission that the account......
-
Reitmeyer v. Ferris Rental Center, Inc.
...accordance with the terms and provisions of said rule amounts to an admission that the account is correct. Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc., 566 S.W.2d 573 (Tex.1978); Brown v. Clark, 557 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1979, no writ); Leyendecker v. Santa Rosa Medical Cente......
-
Brightwell v. Barlow, Gardner, Tucker & Garsek
...permitted to dispute the receipt of the items or services rendered or the correctness of the stated items. Airborne Freight Corp. v. CRB Marketing, Inc., 566 S.W.2d 573 (Tex.1978). Nor is she permitted to deny the claim, Wilson v. Browning Arms Company, 501 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston ......