Akin v. City of Miami
Decision Date | 28 April 1953 |
Parties | AKIN v. CITY OF MIAMI et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Cushman, Gay & Woodard and Lawrence G. Ropes, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Walton, Hubbard, Schroeder, Lantaff & Atkins, Miami, for appellees.
The City of Miami condemned an uncompleted apartment building owned by Florence T. Akin, and thereafter refused to give her a building permit or grant her a reasonable time within which to repair the structure to meet the building requirements of the city. Florence T. Akin thereupon instituted a declaratory judgment suit in the Circuit Court of Dade County seeking a declaration of her rights, an adjudication that the action taken by the city was arbitrary and unlawful, and a money judgment for damages resulting from the unlawful action of the city. At final hearing the trial court granted all relief prayed for except a money judgment, and as to that issue decreed 'That the matter of damages, if any, to the plaintiff owner was not litigated and is not determined in this suit, and this decree is without prejudice to the plaintiff to assert claim or sue for damages against the City for withholding of permit for repairs and construction on said property * * *.'
The city appealed from this decree and the decree was affirmed by this Court without opinion. See City of Miami v. Aiken, Fla., 44 So.2d 816.
After the mandate went down Florence T. Akin instituted the present proceeding to recover damages under authority of section 87.07, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., which provides that
In the petition filed by Florence T. Akin, the sole issue involved the claim for money damages which had resulted from the city's refusal to grant the building permit and which had not been adjudicated in the declaratory decree affirmed by this Court.
The City of Miami moved to dismiss the petition on the grounds that the petition showed on its face that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, and, that inasmuch as the granting or withholding of a building permit by a municipality was the exercise of a purely governmental function, the city could not be held liable in a tort action for damages for the wrongful refusal to issue such a permit.
The trial court granted the motion to dismiss the petition upon the grounds asserted, and this appeal followed.
Both parties to this appeal agree that the exercise of the power by a municipality to grant or refuse a building permit or license is a purely governmental function; and with this we agree. See Clinard v. City of Winston-Salem, 173 N.C. 356, 91 S.E. 1039; James v. City of Toledo, 24 Ohio App. 268, 157 N.E. 309. Section 53.37, McQuillin Mun.Corp., 3d Ed.; 63 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 747; 38 Am.Jur., Mun.Corp., Sec. 605. See also Elrod v. City of Daytona Beach, 132 Fla. 24, 180 So. 378, 118 A.L.R. 1049.
While the appellant concedes that the matter of the issuance of a building permit by a municipality is the exercise of a purely governmental function, she contends, nevertheless, that a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Melchert v. Pro Elec. Contractors
...or quasi-judicial, functions as illustrated in such cases as Elrod v.City of Daytona Beach , 180 So. 378 ; and Akin v. City of Miami , Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 54.Hargrove , 96 So.2d at 133 (citations omitted).¶60 Careful review of the two cases cited in Hargrove clarifies that the Florida Suprem......
-
Kay v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes
...Cal. Gov't Code § 818.4; Colo.Rev.Stat. § 24-20-106; Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-557n; Del.Code Ann. tit. 10 § 4011; Akin v. City of Miami, 65 So.2d 54, 55 (Fla.1953); Ga.Code § 36-33-1; Haw.Rev.Stat. § 662-15; Idaho Code Ann. § 6-904B; 745 Ill. Comp. Stat. 10/2-104; Ind.Code § 34-13-3-3; Kan. Sta......
-
City of Green Cove Springs v. Donaldson
...Village, 3rd D.C.A.Fla.1961, 132 So.2d 764, cert. discharged, 141 So.2d 737; refusal of a city to grant a building permit, Akin v. City of Miami, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 54; and the passage by the city of an unconstitutional ordinance, Elrod v. City of Daytona Beach, 1938, 132 Fla. 24, 180 So. 3......
-
Visidor Corp. v. Borough of Cliffside Park
...as illustrated in such cases as Elrod v. City of Daytona Beach, 132 Fla. 24, 180 So. 378, 118 A.L.R. 1049; and Akin v. City of Miami, Fla.1963, 65 So.2d 54 (37 A.L.R.2d 691).' Elrod rejected a damage claim against a city grounded on its enforcement of an allegedly unconstitutional ordinance......
-
Chapter 9-3 During Foreclosure
...in this case."); Lindsey v. H.M. Raulerson, Jr., Memorial Hosp., 452 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). See also Akin v. City of Miami, 65 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 1953); In re Estate of Rifkin, 359 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bollettieri Resort Villas Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 19......
-
Chapter 9-3 During Foreclosure
...in this case."); Lindsey v. H.M. Raulerson, Jr., Memorial Hosp., 452 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). See also Akin v. City of Miami, 65 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 1953); In re Estate of Rifkin, 359 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bollettieri Resort Villas Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Bank of N.Y.Mellon, 198......