Akin v. First Nat. Bank of Winston-Salem
Decision Date | 21 May 1947 |
Docket Number | 668. |
Citation | 42 S.E.2d 518,227 N.C. 453 |
Parties | AKIN v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF WINSTON-SALEM et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Civil action by widow to require trustee in deed to execute release to her or to remove cloud on title.
Intervention by adopted daughter to reform deed and to enforce trust alleged to have been declared and intended for her benefit by foster father.
It appears that on 22 January 1944, plaintiff's husband A.M. Akin, purchased from C.C. Kiger and wife a house and lot in Davidson County and had the deed made to "The First National Bank of Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N.C., Trustee for A.M. and M.D. Akin," the named cestuis being husband and wife. A.M. Akin, the husband husband of plaintiff, died prior to 5 July, 1945, on which date the plaintiff instituted this action, alleging that the deed in question created a passive or inactive trust, with title and use or right of possession in the cestuis, and that upon the death of plaintiff's husband she became the sole owner thereof by right of survivorship. Wherefore, she asked to be declared the owner in fee simple of the real estate described in the deed and that the defendant Bank be directed to execute to her a deed in clarification of her title.
The defendant Bank filed answer, admitted the passive character of the trust, and disclaimed any interest in the property.
Thereafter Betty Akin Miller, adopted daughter of A.M. and D.M. Akin with leave of the court, intervened and alleged that the property was purchased for her and her children by her foster father, so declared by him before and after the purchase, and that his intentions were not properly expressed in the deed because of mutual mistake and error of the draftsman.
In substantiation of her claim, the intervener offered evidence tending to show that her foster father declared on numerous occasions, before and after the purchase, that he was buying and had bought the property in question for his adopted daughter and her children; that a life estate would go to her and the fee to her children. He added however, that he wanted it put in trust because he was afraid his adopted daughter and her husband would run through with it, or give a mortgage and lose it, and that he had instructed the draftsman to draw the deed accordingly.
The plaintiff in reply, and by cross-examination of intervener's witnesses, produced and elicited evidence tending to show that Mr. Akin told his grantor "he bought this property for his daughter to live in as long as they would do all right; that he didn't make her any deed so she couldn't dispose of it."
The broker, who drafted the deed, testified that Mr. Akin spoke of buying the property for his adopted daughter, but
The Vice President of the Bank testified that Mr. Akin
The intervener has lived in the house with her family since its purchase in January 1944.
The jury returned the following verdict:
Upon the coming in of the verdict, the court of its own motion set it aside for error in failing to direct a verdict for the plaintiff on the first issue in accordance with her prayer.
From this action, the intervener appeals, assigning error.
Thomas D. Carter and Ratcliff, Vaughn, Hudson & Ferrell, allof Winston-Salem, and P.V. Critcher, of Lexington, for plaintiff, appellee.
Elledge & Hayes and H. Bryce Parker, all of Winston-Salem, for intervener, appellant.
When a verdict is set aside for error or errors in law, committed during the trial, and not as...
To continue reading
Request your trial