Akins v. State
| Decision Date | 21 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. S98A1275.,S98A1275. |
| Citation | 504 S.E.2d 196,269 Ga. 838 |
| Parties | AKINS v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Johnny Baxter Mostiler, Griffin, for Scott Lewis Akins.
William T. McBroom, III, Dist. Atty., Daniel A. Hiatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Griffin, Hon. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Frank Anthony Ilardi, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, for the State.
Scott Lewis Akins was convicted of malice murder in the stabbing death of Phillip Roberts. He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial.1 Because the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and there was no error in the trial court's charge to the jury, we affirm.
1. The evidence adduced at trial authorized the jury to find that appellant and the victim had an on-again, off-again sexual relationship. On March 14, 1996, after an evening of drinking, the victim came to appellant's apartment and they began to argue. Appellant testified at trial that the victim insisted that appellant provide him with drugs and swung a glass vase at appellant when he refused. Appellant deflected the vase with a butcher knife, cutting the victim in the left wrist. When the victim swung the vase again, appellant stabbed him just under the left collarbone. The knife penetrated the victim's lung and cut his aorta, causing the victim's death. The victim collapsed outside the door to the apartment and appellant, after hiding the knife in a kitchen drainpipe, woke his brother in an upstairs bedroom and got his assistance to drive the victim to a hospital. Appellant told police at the hospital that the victim had received the fatal wound before he arrived at appellant's apartment. Appellant returned home and cleaned the apartment. The vase was later found to have only appellant's fingerprint on it. The jury also heard testimony that appellant had previously threatened to kill the victim and that the victim feared appellant. Appellant testified that after cutting the victim on the wrist, he did not realize he was holding the sharp end of the knife towards the victim when he attempted the second time to deflect the vase and also force the victim out of the apartment.
Witness credibility is to be determined by the jury, OCGA § 24-9-80, as is the question whether the circumstances of the confrontation between appellant and the victim "were such as to excite the fears of a reasonable person that he had to use deadly force in order to prevent the use of deadly force against him." Andrews v. State, 267 Ga. 473, 474(1), 480 S.E.2d 29 (1997). We find the evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant did not act in self-defense when he stabbed the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pritchett v. State
...for the jury whether the circumstances justified [defendant's] use of a deadly weapon against the victim."); Akins v. State , 269 Ga. 838, 839 (1), 504 S.E.2d 196 (1998) (jury is to determine "the question whether the circumstances of the confrontation between appellant and the victim were ......
-
Castleberry v. State, S01A1042.
...because he feared for himself and his family. 1. Witness credibility is a matter for the jury. OCGA § 24-9-80; Akins v. State, 269 Ga. 838, 839(1), 504 S.E.2d 196 (1998). The evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find Castleberry guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the fel......
-
Durden v. State
...intimidation from Winkfield, a ranking gang member. The jury determines the credibility of witnesses. OCGA § 24-9-80; Akins v. State, 269 Ga. 838(1), 504 S.E.2d 196 (1998). Contrary to appellant's contention that there was not sufficient evidence to show that she was a willing participant i......
- Terry v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY INS.