Ala. Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley
Decision Date | 18 March 2011 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. CV–11–S–761–NE. |
Citation | 272 Ed. Law Rep. 517,190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2712,788 F.Supp.2d 1283 |
Parties | ALABAMA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, an Alabama non-profit corporation; et al., Plaintiffs,v.Robert BENTLEY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama and President of the State School Board; et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREWest CodenotesValidity Called into DoubtAla.Code 1975, § 17–17–5 Edward Still, Birmingham, AL, Alice O'Brien, Philip A. Hostak, National Education Association Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Annary A. Cheatham, Cheatham & Associates PLLC, Herman Watson, Jr, Watson McKinney & Artrip LLP, Huntsville, AL, Gregory B. Stein, Stein and Pilcher LLC, J. Cecil Gardner, Samuel H. Heldman, The Gardner Firm PC, Mobile, AL, Robert D. Segall, Copeland Franco Screws & Gill PA, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiffs.James W. Davis, Margaret L. Fleming, William G. Parker, Jr, Office of the Attorney General, Algert S. Agricola, Jr., Ryals Plummer Donaldson Agricola & Smith PC, Montgomery, AL, Albert L. Jordan, Wallace Jordan Ratliff & Brandt LLC, Birmingham, AL, J.R. Brooks, Taylor P. Brooks, William W. Sanderson, Jr, Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne PC, Julian D. Butler, Sirote and Permutt PC, Huntsville, AL, for Defendants.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs' “Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Restraining Order.” 1 Upon consideration of the motion, pleadings, testimony, exhibits, briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and independent research, the court concludes that the motion is due to be granted, and a preliminary injunction entered. The reasons for that conclusion are set forth below.
The Alabama Code directs city and county boards of education and some postsecondary institutions to adopt procedures that allow their employees to deduct voluntary contributions for, among other things, “membership dues.” The pertinent portion of the applicable statute states:
Each local board of education and certain postsecondary institutions shall adopt policies or regulations which will provide for deductions from salaries of its employees or groups of employees whenever a request is presented to the board or postsecondary institution by the employees or groups. The deductions shall be made from salaries earned in at least nine different pay periods and shall be remitted to the appropriate company, association, or organization as specified by the employees within 10 days following each deduction. The deductions may be made for, but [are] not limited to, savings plans, tax sheltered annuities, the Public Employees' Individual Retirement Account Fund, membership dues, voluntary contributions, and group insurance premiums. Deductions for membership dues and voluntary contributions shall be made based upon membership lists and forms provided by the employees' organization. Such lists are to be corrected, updated, and returned to the employees' designated organization(s) not later than November 10 of each school year.....
Ala.Code § 16–22–6(a) (1975) (2001 Replacement Vol.) (emphasis supplied). That statutory language, with amendments not pertinent to this discussion, has been a part of the corpus of Alabama law since at least 1973. Relatedly, Section 36–1–4.3 states:
(a) The state Comptroller shall adopt statewide policies which provide for deductions from the salaries of state employees or groups of state employees whenever a request is presented to the state Comptroller by a group of participating state employees equal in number to at least 200 provided, however, that deductions being made as of April 23, 1985, shall continue to be made. The deductions shall be made at least monthly and shall be remitted to the appropriate company, association, or organization as specified by the employees. The deductions may be made for membership dues, and voluntary contributions, and insurance premiums. Any deduction provided under the provisions of this section may be terminated upon two months' notice in writing by a state employee to the appropriate company, association, or organization and to the appropriate payroll clerk or other appropriate officials as specified by the state Comptroller.
(b) The state Comptroller may, at his discretion, collect from the deductions withheld a cost of administration fee not to exceed one percent of the total deduction collected.
Ala.Code § 36–1–4.3 (1975) (2001 Replacement Vol.) (emphasis supplied). Again, that statutory language, with amendments not pertinent to this case, has been a part of the corpus of Alabama law since at least 1985.
Both of the foregoing statutes are tempered by Alabama Code § 17–17–5, which is located in a Chapter of the Code addressing “Election Offenses,” and which currently reads as follows:
No person in the employment of the State of Alabama, a county, or a city whether classified or unclassified, shall use any state, county, or city funds, property or time, for any political activities. Any person who is in the employment of the State of Alabama, a county, or a city shall be on approved leave to engage in political action or the person shall be on personal time before or after work and on holidays. It shall be unlawful for any officer or employee to solicit any type of political campaign contributions from other employees who work for the officer or employee in a subordinate capacity. It shall also be unlawful for any officer or employee to coerce or attempt to coerce any subordinate employee to work in any capacity in any political campaign or cause. Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of the crime of trading in public office and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined or sentenced, or both, as provided by Section 13A–10–63.
Ala.Code § 17–17–5 (1975) (2007 Replacement Vol.).2
The subject of this litigation is Alabama Act No. 2010–761 ( ) “which was passed by the Alabama Legislature on December 15, 2010, and signed by then-outgoing Governor Robert Riley on December 20, 2010.” 3 The Act is scheduled to take effect on Sunday, March 20, 2011, and it will amend the language of § 17–17–5 in the following manner:
To amend Section 17–17–5, Code of Alabama 1975, relating to prohibited political activities by state, county, and city employees; to further specifically prohibit employees of the state, a county, a city, a local school board, or other governmental agency from using any agency funds, property, or time arranging for payments by salary deduction, or otherwise, to a political action committee or dues for membership organizations that use funds for political activities.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:
Section 1. Section 17–17–5, Code of Alabama 1975, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) No person in the employment of the State of Alabama, a county, a city, a local school board, or any other governmental agency, whether classified or unclassified, shall use any state, county, city, local school board, or other governmental agency funds, property, or time, for any political activities. 4
“(1) Making contributions to or contracting with any entity which engages in any form of political communication, including communications which mention the name of a political candidate.
“(2) Engaging in or paying for public opinion polling.
“(3) Engaging in or paying for any form of political communication, including communications which mention the name of a political candidate.
“(4) Engaging in or paying for any type of political advertising in any medium.
“(5) Phone calling for any political purpose.
“(6) Distributing political literature of any type.
“(7) Providing any type of in-kind help or support to or for a political candidate.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Towbin v. Antonacci
...Ms. Towbin can show a likelihood of success regarding whether the statute is unconstitutional. See, e.g., Ala. Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley, 788 F.Supp.2d 1283, 1301–02 (N.D.Ala.2011). For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that while Ms. Towbin can establish an impingement of her constitut......
-
Ala. Educ. Ass'n, an Ala. Non-Profit Corp. v. State Superintendent of Educ.
...suffered from a constitutional overbreadth problem and risked prohibiting protected First Amendment activity. Ala. Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley, 788 F.Supp.2d 1283, 1320 (N.D.Ala.2011) “Bentley ”. Second, it found that the term “political activity” was unconstitutionally vague, such that those su......
-
State Superintendent of Educ. v. Ala. Educ. Ass'n, an Ala. Nonprofit Corp.
...jurisdiction over the claims against Governor Bentley, the injunction will be extended to apply to him.” Alabama Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley, 788 F.Supp.2d 1283, 1287 n. 1 (N.D.Ala.2011). 10.Rule 18(a), Ala. R.App. P., provides: “When it shall appear to a court of the United States that there ar......
-
Ala. Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley
...and (4) demonstrate that the injunction will not be adverse to the public interest. See Alabama Education Association v. State Superintendent of Education, 788 F. Supp. 2d 1283, 1301-03 (N.D. Ala. 2011). 7. Id. at 1319-24. 8. Id. at 1324-28. 9. See doc. no. 37 (Preliminary Injunction). 10. ......