Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & Norman

Decision Date19 May 1927
Docket Number6 Div. 804
Citation113 So. 265,216 Ala. 403
PartiesALABAMA FUEL & IRON CO. v. ADAMS, ROWE & NORMAN.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1927

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; C.B. Smith, Judge.

Action by Adams, Rowe & Norman, a partnership composed of W.C. Adams and E.J. Rowe, against the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Objections to argumentative questions held properly sustained.

The contract sued upon is as follows:

"Agreement between Alabama Fuel & Iron Company, a corporation (herein called the operator), and Adams, Rowe &amp Norman, a corporation (herein called the sales agent) witnesseth:
"In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties herein set forth it is agreed as follows:
"First. The operator hereby appoints the sales agent its exclusive agent to sell the entire output of coal produced at mines owned, controlled, or operated by or for the operator situated in Alabama, from the date hereof as herein provided.
"Second. The operator now has certain bona fide contracts covering the sale of part of his output and made prior to the date hereof, and the sales agent agrees that the operator shall complete deliveries under such contracts; the mutual agreement being that the commissions on such coal are to be paid by the operator to the sales agent, as shown on Exhibit 1 hereto attached and made a part hereof. On any renewal of such contracts and on all other contracts or sales, the operator agrees to pay the sales agent a commission of 5 cents per ton. All commissions due hereunder shall be paid to the sales agent at its office in Birmingham Ala., on or before the 20th day of each calendar month, for all coal shipped by the operator during the next preceding calendar month, and shall be based on a ton of 2,000 pounds according to the operator's invoices therefor to the purchasers; said invoices shall be according to railroad scale weights of such coal. Should the operator itself or through any agent other than the sales agent sell any such coal produced by or for it direct to purchasers, the operator agrees to pay the sales agent a commission of 5 cents per ton for all coal so sold by or for it, as and at the time the commissions above mentioned are payable hereunder. If the operator should not be able to collect for any coal sold hereunder, no selling commissions shall be payable to the sales agent on the coal not collected for, and in case such commission has been paid prior to the time it is found impossible to collect for such coal, the amount of commission paid on same shall be refunded by the sales agent to the operator, or, if the operator elects, may be deducted from any amount then or subsequently due the sales agent.
"Third. If at the operator's request any sales of such coal are from time to time invoiced and collections therefor made by the sales agent, the sales agent agrees to pay to the operator at its office in Alabama, on or before the 15th and 30th day of each calendar month, the actual amount of such collections made during the period from the date of such preceding settlement to the date of such settlement, less the sales agent's commission, and the extra charge to be paid by the operator to the sales agent for such additional service shall be 2 cents per ton.
"Fourth. Upon the date hereof the operator shall furnish the sales agent with a schedule of minimum sales prices for each grade of coal so produced by or for the operator, and the sales agent agrees that it will not sell any such coal at prices less than specified in said schedule without the written consent of the operator. Any changes desired to be made by the operator in the minimum prices specified in said schedule shall be binding upon the sales agent forthwith upon receipt of notice from the operator of such change specifying grade of coal affected and the minimum price thereof, provided, however, that spot sales made by the sales agent's salesmen on the road before such change is communicated to them shall not be affected thereby.
"Fifth. All contracts for sales of coal hereunder shall be made for the account and at the risk of the operator, and no contract shall be binding on the operator until accepted or approved by the operator.
"Sixth. The operator shall at all reasonable times have access to the sales agent's records and books of account for the purpose of checking and verifying the business done by the sales agent hereunder. The sales agent shall at all reasonable times have access to the operator's records and books of account for the purpose of checking and verifying weights of such coal and the operator's invoices thereof with reference to the amount of commission due the sales agent hereunder from time to time.
"Seventh. The sales agent agrees to use its best efforts to sell the operator's entire output of such coal at not less than the minimum prices fixed as herein provided.
"Eighth. This agreement shall continue in effect for one year from the date hereof and thereafter until terminated by either party hereto by written notice to the other party 60 days prior to the effective date of such termination. In the event of any such termination, however, the operator agrees to complete deliveries of all unfilled orders and contracts sold and negotiated hereunder by the sales agent, and to pay to the sales agent, as and when herein provided said commission of 5 cents per ton of 2,000 pounds on all coal included in such deliveries.
"Ninth. Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder may be given by registered mail, addressed, postage prepaid, and mailed by either party to the other, at its principal business office, and the date of mailing shall be considered the date of giving any such notice.
"Tenth. This agreement shall not be assigned by either party without the written consent of the other party.
"In witness whereof the parties have caused this agreement to be signed in duplicate by their duly authorized officials, this 31st day of January, 1919. Alabama Fuel & Iron Company, Operator, by Chas. F. De Barkelaben, Vice President. Adams, Rowe & Norman, Inc., Sales Agent, by W.C. Adams, President."

The charges refused to defendant and made the basis of assignments 13, 14, 15, 17, and 18 are as follows:

"(a) If you are reasonably satisfied from the evidence that the Central of Georgia Railway Company and its subsidiary companies refused and declined to make the contracts in question in this suit through Adams, Rowe & Norman, and declined to make such contracts unless they were made direct with the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company, and did make such contracts direct with the defendant, then I charge you that plaintiff cannot recover commissions on such contracts.
"(e) If you are reasonably satisfied from the evidence that Central of Georgia Railway Company did not, in the making of its contract and the contracts of its subsidiary companies, deal direct with Adams, Rowe & Norman, but insisted on dealing direct with the defendant in the final closing of said contracts, and refused to deal with Adams, Rowe & Norman, then I charge you that plaintiffs cannot recover.
"(b) If you are reasonably satisfied from the evidence that the Central of Georgia Railway Company and its subsidiary companies refused and declined to make the contracts in question in this suit through Adams, Rowe & Norman, and declined to make such contracts unless they were made direct with the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company, then I charge you that plaintiff cannot recover commissions on such contracts, though you may believe from the evidence that Adams, Rowe & Norman took part in or assisted in preliminary negotiations in an effort to secure the making of such contracts.
"C. I charge you that, in order for plaintiffs to be entitled to commissions on
coal delivered by defendant after the termination of the agreement between them and defendant, such coal must have been sold by plaintiffs, and in order for it to have been sold by plaintiffs an agreement of sale must have been reached between the buyer and plaintiffs, acting for the defendant, under which the quantity of coal sold and the price thereof must have been fixed.
"D. A sale of coal within the meaning of the contract between plaintiff and defendant would not be made until an agreement had been reached with the buyer, which fixed the quantity of the coal sold and the price to be paid for it."

Assignments 30, 31, and 32 are as follows: "(30) The court erred in sustaining plaintiffs' objections to the following question asked witness Adams: 'Q. Do you contend that it was by your efforts alone that the Central of Georgia Railway Company made these contracts?'

"(31) The court erred in sustaining plaintiffs' objections to the following question asked witness Adams: 'Q. Isn't it a fact that it was not by your effort alone that these contracts were made?'
"(32) The court erred in sustaining plaintiffs' objections to the following question asked witness Adams: 'Q. Don't you know that the Central of Georgia Railway Company, as a matter of course, each year buys its coal from the Alabama Fuel & Iron Company?' "

Percy, Benners & Burr, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Bradley, Baldwin, All & White, James D. Rucker, and William Douglas Arant, all of Birmingham, for appellees.

This case having been submitted under Supreme Court rule 46, the opinion of the court was delivered by Mr. Justice GARDNER:

Suit by appellee against appellant for recovery of commission alleged to be due under written contract, whereby appellee became the exclusive sales agent of appellant for the entire output of its coal mines. Commissions sued for are on sales of coal by appellant to the Central of Georgia Railway Company (hereinafter designated...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Rheuark v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 31, 1992
    ...which involve a question of law.' This rule is applicable to both expert and non-expert witnesses. See also Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & Norman, 216 Ala. 403, 113 So. 265. The reason for such rule is that conclusions of law are exclusively for the Fiorella v. City of Birmingham,......
  • Ar-Con Building Specialties, Inc. v. Famco, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 3, 1973
    ...Briere v. Yeend Bros. Realty Co., 204 Ala. 647, 86 So. 528 (1920), and Handley v. Schaffer, 177 Ala. 636, 59 So. 286 (1912). 8 216 Ala. 403, 113 So. 265 (1927). 9 Id. at 10 215 Ala. 73, 109 So. 364 (1926). 11 Other jurisdictions have fashioned a similar rule. See generally 3 Am.Jur.2d Agenc......
  • McLeod v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 20, 1984
    ...v. Lyon Co., 226 Ala. 235, 146 So. 398 (1933); O'Neal v. Plowden, 220 Ala. 317, 124 So. 882 (1929); Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & Norman, 216 Ala. 403, 113 So. 265 (1927); Malone v. Dillard, 212 Ala. 361, 102 So. 705 Alabama Fuel Sales Co. v. Vulcan Energy Resources, 339 So.2d 10......
  • Fiorella v. City of Birmingham
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 1950
    ...which involve a question of law. This rule is applicable to both expert and non expert witnesses.' See also Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Adams, Rowe & Norman, 216 Ala. 403, 113 So. 265. The reason for such rule is that conclusions of law are exclusively for the Further during the cross examin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT