Alabama State Tenure Com'n v. Phenix City Bd. of Educ. of Phenix City

Decision Date13 March 1985
Parties24 Ed. Law Rep. 655 The ALABAMA STATE TENURE COMMISSION and its members, Mrs. Wright, Mrs. Strong, Mrs. Pritchard, Dr. Caylor, Mr. Harris, Mr. Bryant and Mr. McMillan v. The PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PHENIX CITY, Alabama. Civ. 4606.
CourtAlabama Court of Civil Appeals

Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, for appellant.

Sydney S. Smith, Smith & Smith, Phenix City, for appellee.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This is a teacher tenure case.

Charles Carlisle is a tenured teacher with the Phenix City Board of Education (Board). He was promoted in 1982 to the position of principal of the Susie E. Allen Elementary School. On May 18, 1984, he was advised by the superintendent that the Board had approved his recommended transfer from the position of principal to the position of Assistant Coordinator of the Alternative Learning Center for the 1984-85 school year. Mr. Carlisle protested the transfer and, after a hearing, the Board upheld the superintendent's recommendation and voted to transfer Mr. Carlisle. Mr. Carlisle appealed to the Alabama State Tenure Commission. The Commission reversed the Board's transfer order. The Board, in response, petitioned the Circuit Court of Russell County, Alabama, for a writ of mandamus. Here, another reversal occurred. After reviewing the record, the circuit court held that the decision of reversal by the Tenure Commission was unjust. The Tenure Commission was ordered to vacate its decision and to enter an order affirming the Board's action. Mr. Carlisle and the Tenure Commission appeal.

Our review of a decision of the Tenure Commission is identical to the circuit court's review. Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Oneonta City Board of Education, 376 So.2d 197 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 199 (Ala.1979). It is appellate in nature. The Tenure Commission's conclusions and judgments will not be reversed on appellate review as being unjust unless it is against the preponderance and overwhelming weight of the evidence. Howell v. Alabama State Tenure Commission, 402 So.2d 1041 (Ala.Civ.App.1981); Sumter County Board of Education v. Alabama State Tenure Commission, 352 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1977).

The procedure for transferring a tenured teacher (or principal) is provided in § 16-24-5, Code of Alabama 1975. The school board's superintendent must recommend the transfer and the school board must approve it. A "reason" must be stated if the transfer is contested. The stated reason must be shown by the evidence to serve a reasonable administrative function. It must not be personal, political or arbitrarily unjust. The wisdom or correctness of the transfer is not reviewed.

"It is only the truth of the stated reason which may be attacked. If the transfer was not because of the 'reason' but was in fact for political or personal reasons or was not reasonably supported by the 'reason,' such transfer could be determined to be arbitrary, capricious and unjust upon appeal." (Citations omitted.)

State Tenure Commission v. Pike County Board of Education, 349 So.2d 1173 (Ala.Civ.App.1977).

Mr. Carlisle argues that the trial court erred in holding that the decision of the Tenure Commission was against the preponderance of the evidence.

The record reveals the following facts. In the two years Mr. Carlisle had been principal, there had been a great deal of division among the Susie E. Allen Elementary School staff. The climate had gotten worse in the last school term. The superintendent had discussed the problem several times with Mr. Carlisle. In March 1984 an incident occurred between a teacher and a substitute teacher. Mr. Carlisle had allegedly told the male substitute that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Carlisle v. Phenix City Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 20, 1988
    ...tenure commission appealed to the state court of civil appeals, which affirmed the circuit court. Alabama State Tenure Comm'n v. Phenix City Bd. of Ed., 467 So.2d 263 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). A motion for rehearing was rejected as untimely and no writ of certiorari was Carlisle raised a claim of......
  • State Tenure Com'n v. Randolph County Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • March 23, 1988
    ...that Commission decision was contrary to the preponderance and overwhelming weight of the evidence. Alabama State Tenure Comm'n v. Phenix City Bd. of Educ., 467 So.2d 263 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). In order to sustain a due process violation, the evidence must show that the risk of bias is intoler......
  • Bradshaw v. Alabama State Tenure Com'n
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • January 27, 1988
    ...conclusions are unjust as against the preponderance and great weight of the evidence. Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Phenix City Board of Education, 467 So.2d 263 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). Absent a showing of such unjustness, the decision will not be reversed on appeal. Pratt v. Alabama State......
  • State Tenure Com'n v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • February 1, 1989
    ... ... Civ. 6538 ... Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama ... Feb. 1, 1989 ... Rehearing Denied March 1, ... v. Phenix City Board of Education, 467 So.2d 263 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT