Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Jones

Decision Date10 April 1916
Citation71 So. 318,111 Miss. 196
PartiesALABAMA & VICKSBURG RAILWAY COMPANY v. JONES
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

March, 1916

APPEAL from the circuit court of Rankin county, HON. A. J. MCLAURIN, Judge.

Suit by Maceo Jones against the Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

This was a suit in the circuit court by appellee for injuries received by him, resulting in the loss of a leg. There was a jury and verdict for one thousand, five hundred dollars, and from a judgment thereon this appeal is taken. The record shows that appellee, a negro boy about thirteen years old, weighing one hundred and forty-three pounds and about five and one-half feet in height, was employed by appellant as a laborer on a ditching train, and that his duties were to move dirt from flat cars. On the day of the accident the ditching train had just unloaded some dirt, and left the crew at the place where the dirt had been unloaded, and had taken a side track so that a freight train could pass. When the freight train came along, appellee undertook to jump on the moving train, and was thrown to the ground and injured. It is contended that by reason of his youth it was the duty of appellant to warn him against the danger of jumping on moving trains, and for failure so to do they became guilty of negligence, and consequently liable for the injuries received by appellee.

Reversed.

R. H. & J. H. Thompson, for appellant.

Stingily & McIntyre, for appellee.

OPINION

SMITH, C. J.

Appellant had no cause to anticipate that appellee would jump on or off of passing trains, and therefore was under no duty to warn him not to do so. The peremptory instruction requested by appellant should have been given.

Reversed, and judgment here.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Forbus v. Cobb Bros. Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 27 Febrero 1939
    ... ... State, 163 So. 22; Holland v. State, 142 So. 112; 2 ... Jones on Evidence (2 Ed.), pages 1086 and 1115; Merchants ... Co. v. Tracy, 166 ... Miss. School Supply ... Co., 152 So. 642; Barmore v. Vicksburg S. & P. R ... Co., 38 So. 210; Rounds v. Delaware R. Co., 64 N.Y. 129 ... ...
  • Hartwell Handle Co. v. Jack
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 13 Febrero 1928
    ... ... Tatum v. Crabtree, 130 Miss. 462; A. & V. R. R ... Co. v. Jones, 111 Miss. 196, 71 So. 318; Rose v. Pace, ... 144 Miss. 374, 109 So ... cited from Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, ... Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, ... A few of these decisions by ... our court are Smith v. Vicksburg, 54 Miss ... 615; Campbell v. Bank, 74 Miss. 526, 31 So ... 400, ... ...
  • B. Altman & Co. v. Wall
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 10 Abril 1916
    ... ... Kendricks, 73 ... Miss. 711; Smith v. Jones, Trustee, 65 Miss. 276 ... In the ... instant case, Taylor, in ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT