Albert M. Travis Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

• Decision Date: 06 October 1931
• Parties: ALBERT M. TRAVIS CO. v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

136 So. 884

102 Fla. 1117

ALBERT M. TRAVIS CO. v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.

Florida Supreme Court

October 6, 1931

En Banc.

Error to Circuit Court, Manatee County; W. T. Harrison, Judge.

Action by the Albert M. Travis Company against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. To review the judgment rendered, the plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

ELLIS J., dissenting.

Syllabus by the Court.

SYLLABUS

The clerk of the Circuit Court is not authorized to determine either the sufficiency or the applicability of a plea filed to a declaration. If the plea is in proper form for a plea and is verified under oath the clerk must accept it as a proper plea until it has been held otherwise by the court.

The default having been entered by the clerk when a plea was on file to each count of the declaration, the default was void and properly vacated and set aside by the court.

COUNSEL

Dewey A. Dye, of Bradenton, for plaintiff in error.

Kelly &amp Shaw, of Tampa, for defendant in error.

OPINION

BUFORD C.J.

In this case plaintiff in error sued the defendant in error, filing a declaration in two counts. The first count alleges damages by reason of breach of contract and the second count alleges damages by reason of tort. The defendant filed a plea to each count severally 'that it is not guilty.' The plea was sworn to as is required. The plaintiff filed praecipe for default to be entered by the clerk for failure to plead to the first count of the declaration. The clerk entered the default on the 4th day of December, 1922. On the 5th day of March, 1923, the defendant filed a motion praying an order setting aside and declaring void the default judgment entered by the clerk. The motion was granted, and the default was vacated and declared null and void by order of court dated the 6th of March, 1923. Plaintiff filed motion to vacate that order, which was denied. The court in its order of March 6th authorized and permitted the defendant to plead on or before March 15, 1923. On March 15, 1923, defendant filed seven pleas which were responsive to the counts of the declaration to which they were respectively addressed. A demurrer to the pleas was overruled. On the 5th of September, 1927, a stipulation was filed in the following language, which stipulation was signed by the sttorneys for both parties to the suit:

'It is stipulated and agreed by and between attorneys for the plaintiff and defendant in the above entitled cause, that the demurrer herein filed or to be filed to the amended additional pleas shall be presented to the court having jurisdiction, and that in event said demurrer is overruled that the plaintiff refuse to proceed further in the said cause, that final judgment in said cause will follow said ruling and that the Court overruling said demurrer shall have the right to dismiss the second count of the declaration herein filed, and that final judgment shall thereupon be entered on said demurrer in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.

'Stipulated and agreed the 15th day of August A. D. 1927.' On the 27th day of January, 1931, the court made and entered the following order and judgment:

'This cause coming on this day to be heard upon the plaintiff's demurrer to the first, second and third additional amended pleas, which said demurrer was filed on September 5th, 1927, and the same having been presented to the court upon the stipulation herein filed, the court being duly advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that the said demurrer be and the same hereby is overruled, and the plaintiff having asked that the second count of its declaration be dismissed, it is ordered that said second count be and the same hereby is dismissed and the court having offered leave to the plaintiff to file appropriate reply to the first, second and third additional amended pleas as it might be advised, and the plaintiff in open court declined and refused to file pleadings to said pleas, and refuses to proceed further in said cause, and it having been stipulated that final judgment in said cause shall follow the ruling of the court upon the demurrer, it is

'Further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by its said action, and that the same be and it hereby is dismissed, and that said defendant shall go hence without day, and that said defendant Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation, do have and recover of and from the said plaintiff Albert M. Travis Company, a corporation, its costs...