Albion Elevator Co. v. Chicago & N.W. Transp. Co.
Decision Date | 25 May 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 58020,58020 |
Parties | ALBION ELEVATOR CO. et al., Appellants, v. CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellee. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Thoma, Schoenthal, Davis, Hockenberg & Wine, Des Moines, for appellants.
Gamble, Riepe, Burt, Webster & Fletcher, Des Moines, for appellee.
Heard before MOORE, C. J., and MASON, UHLENHOPP, HARRIS, and McCORMICK, JJ.
On July 6, 1972, sixty grain dealers commenced an action in the Polk District Court against Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, a common carrier of grain, seeking to recover damages for grain lost between various points of departure and destination. Plaintiffs and defendant moved for summary judgment on one of the three theories of recovery asserted in the petition and the district court sustained defendant's motion. Plaintiffs appeal from that ruling and the judgment entered pursuant thereto.
In conjunction with their respective motions for summary judgment, the parties entered into a stipulation setting forth the relevant facts surrounding the controversy. It provides in pertinent part the following:
The stipulation went on to set forth the factual situation surrounding one of plaintiffs' claims as representative of the group's claims. That example provided in part as follows:
The basic contentions of the parties were set forth in the stipulation as follows:
December 19, 1974, the district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and in so ruling concluded as follows:
January 17, 1975, the district court entered judgment for defendant, overruled plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the petition.
A summary of the pertinent stipulated facts gleaned from the statement of the case set forth in plaintiffs' brief may be helpful, particularly in view of the fact defendant makes no complaint of the statement.
The published tariff with respect to grain shipments which defendant must follow by law establishes certain freight rates applicable to minimum weights for the carriage of grain between two specific points. The minimum weight for soybeans as established by tariff is 120,000 pounds. The freight rate applicable to this minimum weight is .476625 per one hundred pounds and since the freight rate is based on the minimum weight rather than the actual destination weight, the railroad consistently collects a full charge of $571.95 (120,000 pounds X .476625 per one hundred pounds) regardless of the actual destination weight.
In the particular claim presented for illustration in the stipulated facts the consignor loaded 120,000 pounds but only 117,640 pounds were delivered by the carrier. Irrespective of this shortage the railroad collected the same freight charge ($571.95) on 117,640 pounds of soybeans as it would have received on 120,000 pounds of soybeans if that amount had been delivered.
The contractual relationship between the grain elevators (consignors) and the grain buyers (consignees) provides the contract purchase price of the grain is determined on the price or value of the grain at the shipping point and not at the destination point. Freight charges are to be paid by the consignee, collected at destination. The contract also requires the consignors to load and deliver minimum weights. The consignors agreed to assume any loss resulting from failure to deliver minimum weights of grain.
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Nat. Fire Ins. v. Yellow Freight Systems
...cost of the shipment ... plus Allied's shipping costs ... minus the shipment's salvage value"); see also Albion Elevator Co. v. Chicago & N.W. Transp. Co., 254 N.W.2d 6, 18 (Iowa 1977) ("[W]here a shipper, as here, receives only the point of shipment value of the lost commodity rather than ......
-
BINL, Inc. v. United States, 12-71C
...R.R. Co. v. Olivit Bros., 243 U.S. 574, 586 (1917); Am. Nat'l Fire, 325 F.3d at 933-34; Albion Elevator Co. v. Chi. & N.W. Transp. Co., 254 N.W.2d 6, 18 (Iowa 1977) ("[W]here a shipper, as here, receives only the point of shipment value of the lost commodity rather than its destination valu......
-
BINL, Inc. v. United States, 12-71C
...Id.; see Pa. R.R. Co. v. Olivit Bros., 243 U.S. 574, 586 (1917); Am. Nat'l Fire, 325 F.3d at 933-34; Albion Elevator Co. v. Chi. & N.W. Transp. Co., 254 N.W.2d 6, 18 (Iowa 1977) ("[W]here a shipper, as here, receives only the point of shipment value of the lost commodity rather than its des......
-
Ensco, Inc. v. Weicker Transfer and Storage Co., s. 80-1889
...Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. Olivit Bros., 243 U.S. 574, 585-86, 37 S.Ct. 468, 472, 61 L.Ed. 908 (1917); Albion Elevator v. Chicago & N.W. Transp. Co., 254 N.W.2d 6, 17-18 (Iowa), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 301, 54 L.Ed.2d 190 (1977). Similarly, shippers who have not paid such fees co......