Alenkowsky v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 12 October 1916 |
Docket Number | (No. 601.) |
Citation | 188 S.W. 956 |
Parties | ALENKOWSKY v. TEXAS & N. O. RY. CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Wm. Masterson, Judge.
Action by Ezrel Alenkowsky against the Texas & New Orleans Railway Company. Judgment on peremptory instruction for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Graves & Graves, of Houston, for appellant. Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, Lane, Wolters & Storey, and Paul Kayser, all of Houston, for appellee.
Alenkowsky was an employé of appellee, and on September 7, 1913, while in the discharge of his duties, his left leg was broken about halfway between the knee and ankle. It was alleged that such injuries were caused by appellee's negligence. He was immediately taken to defendant's hospital, and remained there until about February 10, 1914, under the care and treatment of defendant's surgeons, Drs. Knox and E. J. Hamilton. On Dec. 1, 1913, he accepted from the defendant the sum of $600, and in consideration thereof gave a written release of his claim for damages. In avoidance of this release the plaintiff alleged:
The cause was tried before a jury, and upon the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence a peremptory instruction was given in favor of defendant upon the theory that an issue had not been raised with respect to the validity of the release. In accordance with this instruction a verdict was returned and judgment rendered in defendant's favor, and the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal therefrom.
Plaintiff testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estes v. MaGee
... ... Higgins , 95 ... Okla. 32, 217 P. 193; Pattison v. Seattle R. & S. Ry ... Co. , 55 Wash. 625, 104 P. 825; Alenkowsky v. Texas & ... N. O. Ry. Co. , (Tex. Civ. App.) 188 S.W. 956; Malloy ... v. Chicago G. W. R. Co. , 185 Iowa 346, 170 N.W. 481; ... Gulf, C. & S ... ...
-
Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Pickens
...representations are proved to be untrue in fact. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. v. Thomas, Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W. 839; Alenkowsky v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 188 S.W. 956; Houston T. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 69 S.W. 651. And while it is true that an estimate of the time requi......
-
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Thomas
...erred as charged; for the statement of Doctor Daniels that appellee's "jaw was not broken" was as to an existing fact (Alenkowsky v. Ry. Co. [Tex. Civ. App.] 188 S. W. 956; R. Co. v. Haven [Tex. Civ. App.] 200 S. W. 1152,) and there was testimony to support findings made by the jury (1) tha......
-
Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Cole
...El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. Kramer (Tex.Civ.App.) 141 S.W. 122 (writ refused); 20 Tex.Jur. § 105, p. 153; Alenkowsky v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. (Tex.Civ.App.) 188 S.W. 956; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Thomas (Tex.Civ. App.) 244 S.W. 839; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown (Tex.Civ.App.)......