Alessi v. Municipal Court In and For Canon City, 76--013
Decision Date | 22 July 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 76--013,76--013 |
Citation | 556 P.2d 87,38 Colo.App. 153 |
Parties | Joseph E. ALESSI, Jr., et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. MUNICIPAL COURT IN AND FOR the CANON CITY, Colorado, and the Honorable John I. Williams, Municipal Judge, Respondents-Appellees. . I |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Dennis E. Faulk, Canon City, for petitioners-appellants.
Breyfogle & Allen, Larry Dean Allen, Canon City, for respondents-appellees.
Petitioners are five defendants in traffic cases brought in the municipal court of Canon City, Colorado. Each moved for dismissal of his individual case, asserting that the 'summons and complaint' was insufficient to accord the court personal jurisdiction over him. The cases were consolidated for argument on the legal issues. After denial of the motions to dismiss, petitioners sought a writ of prohibition in district court to show cause why further proceedings in the municipal court should not be prohibited. The district court discharged the order to show cause, from which order petitioners now appeal. We affirm.
Petitioners' challenge to the summons and complaint is premised on the fact that the Canon City Code makes no provision for the issuance of a summons and complaint by a police officer. However, the power and obligation to promulgate rules governing the procedure in civil and criminal cases is vested in the Supreme Court of Colorado. Colo.Const. Art. VI, § 21.
Furthermore, the legislature has made it clear that the power of home rule cities over the operation of their municipal courts has some limitations, specifically in relation to rules of procedure. Section 13--10--103, C.R.S.1973 provides:
Courts of home rule cities, of which Canon City is one, are not excepted from the purview of municipal court rules of procedure issued by the Supreme Court. Hardamon v. Municipal Court, 178 Colo. 271, 497 P.2d 1000. Therefore, questions of jurisdictional defects based on insufficiency of process are to be resolved in accordance with the requirements of the Colorado Municipal Court Rules of Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court, and effective April 1, 1970.
C.M.C.R. 206(c)(3) provides that a peace officer may issue a summons and complaint either for 'an offense constituting a violation which was committed in his presence or, if not committed in his presence, when he has reasonable grounds for believing that the offense was committed in fact and that the offense was committed by the person charged.' It also provides that a copy of that summons and complaint shall be filed immediately with the appropriate court. C.M.C.R. 206(c)(4) enumerates the type of information which must be provided in the document to constitute sufficient notice to the defendant:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Colorado Springs v. Forance
...The purpose of these rules "is to provide for simplicity in procedure and fairness in administration." Alessi v. Municipal Court, 38 Colo.App. 153, 156, 556 P.2d 87, 89 (1976). The court of appeals held in Alessi that "[w]here the city and municipal court name is printed on the face of the ......
-
People in Interest of R. J. G.
... ... and B.G., Respondlents. The CITY AND COUNTY ... OF DENVER, Colorado, a Municipal ... No. 75--898 ... Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I ... July 22, 1976 ... ...
-
Chapter 2 - § 2.5 • PROCEDURES FOR ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEAS
...Dep't of Revenue, 501 P.2d 479 (Colo. App. 1972) (use of penalty assessment procedure for speeding violations); Alessi v. Mun. Court, 556 P.2d 87 (Colo. App. 1976) (traffic violations under municipal court rules); City of Colo. Springs v. Forance, 776 P.2d 1107 (Colo. 1989) (traffic violati......
-
Chapter 1 - § 1.1 • THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
...procedure in criminal cases. The statutes for simplified criminal procedures have generally been upheld. See Alessi v. Municipal Court, 556 P.2d 87 (Colo. App. 1976) (upholding home-rule city's traffic summons and complaint under the Colorado Municipal Court Rules of Procedure); Cave v. Col......
-
Civil Enforcement of Building and Zoning Codes in Municipal Court
...Ordinance No. 800 (1989) at §§ 5-5(a)(6). 15-9(a)(6), 26-2(b)(6). 34. See, Colo. Const. Art. VI, § 2; see also, Alessi v. Municipal Court, 556 P.2d 87, 88-89 (Colo. 1976). 35. See generally, Black's Law Dictionary 923 (4th ed., 1968). 36. Koch v. Story, 107 P. 1093, 1095 (Colo. 1910); see a......