Alexander Film Co. v. State, Use Phillips County
Decision Date | 24 February 1941 |
Docket Number | 4-6217 |
Citation | 147 S.W.2d 1011,201 Ark. 1052 |
Parties | ALEXANDER FILM COMPANY v. STATE, USE PHILLIPS COUNTY |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; E. M. Pipkin, Judge; reversed.
Judgment reversed and dismissed.
Brickhouse & Brickhouse, for appellant.
John L Anderson and Douglas S. Heslep, for appellee.
Separate suits were brought in the name of the state of Arkansas for the benefit of Phillips county in the circuit court of said county against appellants to recover from each a penalty of $ 3,000 for failing to qualify as foreign corporations under §§ 2247 to 2251, inclusive, of Pope's Digest before transacting business in the state of Arkansas.
For the purposes of trial the cases were consolidated in the circuit court and heard upon an agreed statement of facts resulting in a judgment of $ 1,000 against each appellant, from which is this appeal.
The agreed statement of facts on which the case was heard is as follows:
By reference to the agreed statement of facts it will be seen that a penalty of $ 1,000 was assessed against one of the appellants in a suit brought in Independence county, and a penalty of $ 1,000, was assessed against the other appellant in a suit brought in White county, and that after each paid the judgment against it each qualified and obtained a certificate to do business in Arkansas under §§ 2247, 2248, 2249, 2250, and 2251 of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
North American Phillips Commercial Electronics Corp. v. Gaytri Corp.
...§ 64-1202 is a penal statute and must be strictly construed in favor of those against whom the penalty is sought. Alexander Film Co. v. State, 201 Ark. 1052, 147 S.W.2d 1011; Murray Tool Co. v. State, 203 Ark. 874, 159 S.W.2d 71. In thus strictly construing the statute in favor of the appel......
-
United Press Intern., Inc. v. Hernreich
...§ 64--1202 is a penal statute and must be strictly construed in favor of those against whom the penalty is sought. Alexander Film Co. v. State, 201 Ark. 1052, 147 S.W.2d 1011; Murray Tool Co. v. State, 203 Ark. 874, 159 S.W.2d 71. In thus strictly construing the statute in favor of the appe......
- Magness v. Sellers
-
Standard Abstract & Title Co., Inc. v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., RECTOR-PHILLIPS-MORS
...on foreign corporations which do business in Arkansas without a certificate of authority. In Alexander Film Co. v. State ex rel. Phillips County, 201 Ark. 1052, 147 S.W.2d 1011 (1941), we discussed § 64-1202 and stated that since it is a penal statute, it must be strictly construed in favor......