Allen v. Berry

Decision Date31 March 1872
CitationAllen v. Berry, 50 Mo. 90 (Mo. 1872)
PartiesHENRY C. ALLEN, Respondent, v. ISAAC L. BERRY et al., Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

Sharp & Broadhead, for appellants.

Hill & Jewett, for respondent.

ADAMS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit instituted in the Franklin Circuit Court, and brought to the St. Louis Circuit Court by change of venue, to set aside as fraudulent and void as to this plaintiff certain deeds of conveyance of lands in Franklin county, made by the defendant Berry to his co-defendant, Jones. Among the pieces of property so conveyed was a lot and house known as the Hamilton house, on which there was a mortgage to the county at the time the alleged fraudulent deeds were made. After this Hamilton house was conveyed to Jones, the evidence shows that he put improvements on it to the amount of some $1,200 or $1,500. The plaintiff was a creditor of Berry and recovered judgments against him, and under execution on these judgments bought the Hamilton house and the other property in 1860. The defendant Jones, however, held possession of the Hamilton house up to 1864, for four years, and the rents and profits were proven to be worth $100 per annum. The mortgage of the county was at this time foreclosed by sale, and this property brought $2,400, which, after payment of the county debt of some $1,700, went into Jones' hands. The evidence also shows that Berry had put notes into Jones' hands to pay the county mortgage, but he did not so appropriate them.

The evidence clearly conduces to show that the conveyance by Berry to Jones was made to defraud his creditors, and that Jones was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
41 cases
  • Lionberger v. Baker
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1885
    ...to the land in him, and cannot be compelled to accept the amount of the judgment with all costs and expenses in lieu of the land. Allen v. Berry, 50 Mo. 90; Kinealy v. Macklin, 2 Mo. App. 241. (8) A proceeding in equity to have a fraudulent deed annulled will be sustained even though the pl......
  • Salemonson v. Thompson
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1904
    ...the conveyance as void. McKinney v. Bank, 104 Ill. 180; Bostwick v. Blake, 145 Ill. 85, 34 N.E. 38; Hall v. Stryker, 27 N.Y. 596; Allen v. Berry, 50 Mo. 90; M'Kee Gilchrist, 3 Watts, 230. In Hall v. Stryker, supra, it was said, in reference to rights of creditors in the property of a debtor......
  • Graff v. Continental Auto Ins. Underwriters, Springfield, Ill.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 1931
    ...for money, if any, it has paid therefor. "For the maxim is that 'He who hath committed iniquity shall not have equity.'" Allen v. Berry et al., 50 Mo. 90; McNichols v. Rubleman, 13 Mo.App. 515; v. Goldsby, 32 Mo.App. 560; Lampkin v. Bank, 98 Mo.App. 239. Inadequacy of consideration is a bad......
  • Blixt v. Janowiak
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1922
    ...Leqve v. Stoppel, 64 Minn. 74, 86, 66 N. W. 208;Lynch v. Burt, 132 Fed. 417, 432, 67 C. C. A. 305;Stephon v. Topic, 180 N. W. 221;Allen v. Berry, 50 Mo. 90, 91;Thompson v. Bickford, 19 Minn. 17 (Gil. 1, p. 5); Strike v. McDonald, 2 Har. & G. (Md.) 191; Lynch v. Murray, 86 Vt. 1, 83 Atl. 746......
  • Get Started for Free