Allen v. Florida Dept. of Military Affairs
| Decision Date | 04 April 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-947,90-947 |
| Citation | 576 So.2d 971,16 Fla. L. Weekly 882 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 882 LTC William L. ALLEN (RET), Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Aaron R. Cohen of Law Offices of Lansing J. Roy, Keystone Heights, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Frank E. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
The appellant Allen, as plaintiff below, filed a complaint against the Florida Department of Military Affairs, which moved to dismiss it on various grounds. Pursuant to a hearing on that motion, the trial court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss, but lacking any words of actual dismissal. Allen filed his appeal to this court within thirty days of entry of the foregoing order. The issue which we address is whether that order constitutes a final order for appellate purposes.
In Lawler v. Harris, 418 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), we agreed with the Third District in Gries Investment Company v. Chelton, 388 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), that an order merely granting a motion to dismiss is neither a judgment nor a final dismissal. Subsequently, in Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc., 550 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), we abandoned the Lawler remedy of a temporary relinquishment of jurisdiction to allow the parties to obtain a final appealable order and opted instead for outright dismissal of defective appeals from non-appealable orders.
In the interim between Lawler and Arcangeli, the Florida Supreme Court adopted the Gries rationale in Board of County Commissioners of Madison County v. Grice, 438 So.2d 392 (Fla.1983), stating:
An order on a motion to dismiss may not be final, but an order which actually dismisses the complaint is.
Grice upheld the finality of an order which actually dismissed the complaint, expressly citing to Gries, and was in accordance with our analysis in Lawler. We, of course, are bound by the Grice decision emanating from the Florida Supreme Court, a decision which has not been modified or superseded at any subsequent time. The Fourth District has also recognized the availing authority of Grice in respect to the issue of dismissing appeals from non-final orders, and has further recognized that the holding in Grice relied upon Gries Investment, as we did in Lawler. See Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). 1
In our recent opinion in State v. Saufley, 574 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick
...merely an order granting a motion, not an order dismissing an action, and it is therefore not appealable. Allen v. Florida Dept. of Military Affairs, 576 So.2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Becton v. K & L Contractors, Inc., 573 So.2d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Wetterauer v. Frontenac Flea Market,......
-
BCH Mechanical, Inc. v. McCoy
...jurisdiction to review this case. See Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, 579 So.2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Allen v. Florida Department of Military Affairs, 576 So.2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Becton v. K & L Contractors, Inc., 573 So.2d 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Wetterauer v. Frontenac Flea Market, I......
-
Jake and the Fat Man Bike Week Usa, Inc. v. Biker Design, Inc., 5D04-190.
...order. Jim Macon Bldg. Contractors, Inc. v. Lake County, 763 So.2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Allen v. Fla. Dept. of Military Affairs, 576 So.2d 971, 972 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Motions for rehearing of nonfinal orders do not toll the time for taking an appeal. Bennett v. Bennett, 645 So.......
-
Friends of Lubavitch/Landow Yeshivah v. Northern Trust Bank of Florida
...which granted defendant's motion to dismiss does not constitute a final order for appellate purposes. See Allen v. Florida Dept. of Military Affairs, 576 So.2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Gries Inv. Co. v. Chelton, 388 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA The plaintiff has the right to initially select ven......