Allen v. State, 94-1270

Decision Date16 September 1994
Docket NumberNo. 94-1270,94-1270
Citation642 So.2d 815
Parties19 Fla. L. Weekly D2052 Cody ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Patrick Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

DAVIS, Judge.

Cody Allen appeals that portion of his judgment and sentence imposing a condition of probation requiring him to reimburse the Columbia County Sheriff's Department for medical expenses in the amount of $16.95. Mr. Allen seeks reversal of the restitution order under the authority of Comeau v. State, 611 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which this court held that the county had a duty to provide medical care to a prisoner in its custody and reversed an order imposing an obligation to reimburse the sheriff's office for medical care as a condition of probation. Although the defendant in Comeau pleaded guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea, id., that case is distinguishable from the instant case because Comeau did not agree to reimburse the cost of medical care as a part of the plea agreement. Here, in contrast, Mr. Allen's plea bargain included, as a specific component, the obligation to reimburse the sheriff's office for these medical costs. Mr. Allen bargained for this obligation and thereby waived any objection to the legality of a sentence containing this condition of probation. Having accepted the benefits of his plea bargain, Mr. Allen will not be relieved of his burdens under the contract. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607, 608 (Fla.1994); see also Mann v. State, 622 So.2d 595, 596-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (affirming summary denial of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion, court held that appellant would be bound by terms of plea contracts entered into after extensive negotiations as to both guilt and sentence).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Carson v. State, Case No. 1D09-5698 (Fla. App. 4/26/2010)
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 26, 2010
    ...[has] thereby waived any objection to the legality of the sentence containing [a] condition of probation." Allen v. State, 642 So. 2d 815, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The State further cited case law holding that because a plea agreement is a contract, Appellant contracted for drug probation. ......
  • Metellus v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 2002
    ...included as a specific component of a plea agreement that was bargained for and voluntarily entered into by defendant. Allen v. State, 642 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). 722 So.2d at 907; see also A.D.W. v. State, 777 So.2d 1101, 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (acknowledging that "plea agreements ......
  • Nelson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 19, 2001
    ...specifically agreeing to these conditions of probation in his plea agreement, Nelson waived any objection thereto. See Allen v. State, 642 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Garcia v. State, 722 So.2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA AFFIRMED. ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur. 1. The parties never clarify......
  • ADW v. State, 2D99-4483.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 26, 2001
    ...included as a specific component of a plea agreement that was bargained for and voluntarily entered into by defendant. Allen v. State, 642 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Minors are allowed, contrary to A.D.W.'s arguments to the court, to enter into agreements for pretrial intervention throu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The high cost of arrestee medical treatment: the effects of F.S.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 78 No. 10, November 2004
    • November 1, 2004
    ...(1) Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 85-06 (1985). (2) See Comeau v. State, 611 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1992). (3) But see Allen v. State, 642 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1994), where court distinguished Comeau and allowed reimbursement of medical costs to be imposed as a condition of probation where......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT