Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Max L. Raab Productions, Inc.

Citation38 A.D.2d 537,327 N.Y.S.2d 167
PartiesALLIED ARTISTS PICTURE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAX L. RAAB PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Decision Date21 December 1971
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

T. F. Ryan, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

M. London, New York City, for defendant-respondent.

Before STEVENS, P.J., and CAPOZZOLI, MARKEWICH, MURPHY and McNALLY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 20, 1971, denying plaintiff's motion for a protective order vacating defendant's notice of discovery and inspection, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

The two interoffice memoranda prepared by plaintiff's former resident counsel and vice-president were legal in nature, in effect, constituting analysis and advice by an attorney to his client. Accordingly, plaintiff has properly invoked the attorney-client privilege (CPLR, 3101(b), (c), (d)). Moreover, the memoranda do not constitute 'evidence material and necessary' to the defense of this action (CPLR 3101(a)).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Rossi v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1989
    ...applies to communications with attorneys, whether corporate staff counsel or outside counsel (see, e.g., Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Raab Prods., 38 A.D.2d 537, 327 N.Y.S.2d 167). Finally, while the cases largely concern communications by clients to their attorneys, CPLR 4503 speaks of ......
  • Rossi v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 12, 1988
    ...Matter of Priest v. Hennessy, 51 N.Y.2d 62, 431 N.Y.S.2d 511, 409 N.E.2d 983 (1980) ]. In Allied Artists Picture Corporation v. Raab Productions, Inc., 38 A.D.2d 537, 327 N.Y.S.2d 167 (1st Dept.1971) the First Department held that the attorney-client privilege was properly invoked to protec......
  • People v. Belge
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • November 14, 1977
    ...Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Assn., 320 F.2d 314, cert. den. 375 U.S. 929, 84 S.Ct. 330, 11 L.Ed.2d 262; Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Raab Prods., 38 A.D.2d 537, 327 N.Y.S.2d 167). The corporate attorney-client privilege, however, is not available "to allow a corporation to funnel its p......
  • Rockwood Nat. Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 3, 1978
    ...examination of Joseph Boyle are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege (see CPLR 4503; Allied Artists Picture Corp. v. Raab Prods., 38 A.D.2d 537, 327 N.Y.S.2d 167; United States v. Kovel, 2 Cir., 296 F.2d 918, ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT