Allright, Inc. v. Elledge
Decision Date | 24 July 1974 |
Docket Number | No. B--4734,B--4734 |
Citation | 515 S.W.2d 266 |
Parties | ALLRIGHT, INC., Appellant, v. Roy Lee ELLEDGE, Jr., Appellee. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Tipton & Bishop, George M. Bishop and W. Timothy Lewis, Houston, for appellant.
Chilton Bryan, Lowell T. Cage, Houston, for appellee.
ON CERTIFIED QUESTION
The following question has been certified to the Supreme Court pursuant to Rules 461 and 465, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure:
Is a written agreement, entered into by a parking lot owner and an individual parking in a parking facility on a month-to-month basis, which agreement limits the parking lot owner's liability to a maximum of $100.00 for loss to the bailed automobile due to theft occasioned by the ordinary negligence of the parking lot owner, void as against public policy?
Parties may agree to limit the liability of one for future negligence unless the agreement violates the constitution or statutes or public policy. Anno: Limiting Liability for Own Negligence, 175 A.L.R. 8 (1948). There is no impediment in the Texas Constitution or statutes preventing bailees generally from limiting their liability. The Legislature has enabled warehousemen and common carriers to limit liability to a stated value of the property. V.T.C.A., Bus. & Comm.Co., § 7.204(b) and 7.309(b); but see Art. 883, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.
In determining whether a contractual agreement limiting liability is against public policy we look to the relationship between the parties. If because of this relationship there exists a disparity of bargaining power, the agreement will not be enforced. Crowell v. Dallas Housing Authority, 495 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.1973). A disparity of bargaining power exists when one party has no real choice in accepting an agreement limiting the liability of the other party. In Crowell a public body organized for the declared public purpose of providing safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations to persons of low income sought to limit its liability for damages resulting from theft, conditions on the premises or from any other cause. Persons of low income had no real choice but to accept this limitation in order to secure safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations. This presented a classic example of disparity of bargaining power and the agreement was held to be contrary to public policy.
A parking lot owner who is a bailee for hire owes the duty of ordinary care to protect the bailor's automobile from theft. McAshan v. Cavitt, 149 Tex. 147, 229 S.W.2d 1016 (1950); Vollmer v. Stoneleigh-Maple Terrace, Inc., 226 S.W.2d 926 (Tex.Civ.App.1950, writ ref'd). The prior Texas cases dealing with the limitation of liability by parking lots have presented attempts to impose the limitation by posting notice on the wall or by print on the claim check. It has been decided that limitations of liability must be called to the attention of the bailor before they may become part of the bailment contract. McAshan v. Cavitt, supra; Ford v. McWilliams, 278 S.W.2d 338 (Tex.Civ.App.1955, no writ). Munger Automobile Co. v. American Lloyds of Dallas, 267 S.W. 304 (Tex.Civ.App.1924, no writ). Furthermore, these provisions are strictly construed against the bailee. Langford v. Nevin, 117 Tex. 130, 298 S.W. 536 (1927); McAshan v. Cavitt, supra; Timmins v. Schroeder, 26 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.Civ.App.1930, no writ).
This Court in the Crowell opinion referred to some support for the nullification of attempts to limit liability...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Riley v. Champion Intern. Corp.
...including those which release or indemnify for one's own negligence, are enforceable under Texas law. See Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266, 267 (Tex.1974). Enforcement of these clauses is based upon satisfaction of fair-notice requirements, which ensure that indemnity and release a......
-
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Delanney, 9614
...of liability clauses where there is such a disparity of bargaining power that the contract is one of adhesion, Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.1974), this contractual provision would not serve to limit Southwestern Bell's damages for its negligent conduct. Helms v. Southweste......
-
ABRAXAS PETROLEUM v. HORNBURG, 08-98-00286-CV
...exculpatory clauses in a contract are utilized to exempt one party from future liability for negligence. See Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266, 267 (Tex. 1974); Crowell v. Housing Auth. of the City of Dallas, 495 S.W.2d 887, 889 (Tex. 1973); Wilson v. Ferguson, 747 S.W.2d 499, 503 (......
-
Held v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Intern., Inc., Civ. No. 4-85-1148.
...can disclaim liability for negligence, the contract language to that effect must be clear and unequivocal. Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. 1974). Since Heavy Industries has made no such disclaimer, it is subject to a cause of action for 2. Liability of Defendant Aircraft Int......
-
A Limitation-Of-Liability Clause May Or May Not Be Enforceable For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims
...for actual damages.'); Vallance & Co. v. DeAnda, 595 S.W.2d 587, 590 (Tex. App.'San Antonio 1980, no writ); Allrights, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266, 267 (Tex. 1974). When determining whether a limitation of liability provision violates public policy, courts will generally consider whethe......
-
A Limitation-Of-Liability Clause May Or May Not Be Enforceable For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claims
...for actual damages.'); Vallance & Co. v. DeAnda, 595 S.W.2d 587, 590 (Tex. App.'San Antonio 1980, no writ); Allrights, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266, 267 (Tex. 1974). When determining whether a limitation of liability provision violates public policy, courts will generally consider whethe......
-
Defendant's Standard Brief in Support of Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Federal Court)
...Alford v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 939 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1991)............................ Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Bacashihua v. United States Postal Service, 859 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1988)............................ Bhatia v. Johnston, 818 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1987......
-
Defendant's Standard Brief in Support of Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Federal Court)
...Alford v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 939 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1991)............................ Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Bacashihua v. United States Postal Service, 859 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1988)............................ Bhatia v. Johnston, 818 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1987......
-
Defendant's standard brief in support of motion to stay pending arbitration (Federal Court)
...Alford v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 939 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1991)............................ Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Bacashihua v. United States Postal Service, 859 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1988)............................ Bhatia v. Johnston, 818 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1987......
-
Fan websites' use of trademarks in their domain names: fair or foul?
...(1964); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948)). (192.) 2TheMart.com, Inc., 140 F. Supp. 2d at 1092. (193.) See Allright, Inc. v. Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266, 267-68 (Tex. (194.) See JUVENTUS F.C. S.p.A. v. Claudio Sacco Interactive, Case No. D2001-0260, (WIPO Apr. 21, 2001) (Barbero, Arb.) , av......